Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A comparison of spinal Anaesthesia in traditional sitting position versus cross-legged sitting position in Parturients undergoing elective caesarean section—a Randomised controlled trial

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Spinal anaesthesia is the preferred technique for caesarean delivery, owing to the several benefits it carries for mother and fetus. Appropriate patient positioning is vital as it improves the patient comfort, reduces the time taken, the number of attempts required, and decreases the number of needle and bone contacts during the procedure. Our study primarily aimed to compare number of attempts taken for successful needle placement in a sitting position versus a cross-legged sitting position. Secondary objectives included patient comfort, ease of palpation, and block characteristics. Methods: Our study was a prospective, nonblinded, single-centre study. The patients were randomly assigned to one of the two groups using a computer-generated randomisation table and opaque envelope technique. A total of 110 parturients posted for the elective caesarean delivery received spinal anaesthesia in either a traditional sitting position or a cross-legged sitting position. Results: The parturients in both groups were comparable in terms of age, height and weight. The number of attempts was equal in both groups, with 60 % of patients were successful at 1st attempt; n = 33 p-Value = 0.384).

Original languageEnglish
Article number100556
JournalPerioperative Care and Operating Room Management
Volume41
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 12-2025

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
  • Medical–Surgical
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A comparison of spinal Anaesthesia in traditional sitting position versus cross-legged sitting position in Parturients undergoing elective caesarean section—a Randomised controlled trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this