TY - JOUR
T1 - A Survey of Speech-Language Pathologists' Applications of Motor Learning Principles in Dysphagia Therapy in Adults in India
AU - Dodderi, Thejaswi
AU - Muthukumar, Varsha
AU - Hedge, Prasanna Suresh
AU - Rai, Santosh P.V.
AU - Moolambally, Sheetal Raj
AU - Balasubramanium, Radish Kumar
AU - Kothari, Mohit
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
PY - 2023/10/4
Y1 - 2023/10/4
N2 - PURPOSE: In the study, we investigated whether speech-language pathologists (SLPs) in India use practice and feedback conditions of motor learning principles (MLPs), including biofeedback, in dysphagia therapy in adults using a problem-solution approach. METHOD: Based on a literature review and clinical experience, we developed and validated a hypothetical case involving an adult with dysphagia (representing the problem) and a purpose-built 22-item questionnaire (representing the solution). We distributed the questionnaire electronically by sending an e-mail to 2,069 SLPs and also published a flyer on the dysphagia special interest group of India. RESULTS: A total of 107 SLPs anonymously submitted their responses. In practice conditions, most of the SLPs reported following massed over distributed, small over large, blocked over random, whole over part, variable over constant, and internal over external practice strategies. In feedback conditions, most of the participants reported using knowledge of results over performance, high over low, immediate over delayed, and self over therapist feedback strategies. Lastly, more than two thirds of SLPs did not use biofeedback devices for dysphagia therapy. CONCLUSION: The findings from our study indicate that SLPs in India do not adhere uniformly to the recommended practices of MLPs for dysphagia therapy in adults.
AB - PURPOSE: In the study, we investigated whether speech-language pathologists (SLPs) in India use practice and feedback conditions of motor learning principles (MLPs), including biofeedback, in dysphagia therapy in adults using a problem-solution approach. METHOD: Based on a literature review and clinical experience, we developed and validated a hypothetical case involving an adult with dysphagia (representing the problem) and a purpose-built 22-item questionnaire (representing the solution). We distributed the questionnaire electronically by sending an e-mail to 2,069 SLPs and also published a flyer on the dysphagia special interest group of India. RESULTS: A total of 107 SLPs anonymously submitted their responses. In practice conditions, most of the SLPs reported following massed over distributed, small over large, blocked over random, whole over part, variable over constant, and internal over external practice strategies. In feedback conditions, most of the participants reported using knowledge of results over performance, high over low, immediate over delayed, and self over therapist feedback strategies. Lastly, more than two thirds of SLPs did not use biofeedback devices for dysphagia therapy. CONCLUSION: The findings from our study indicate that SLPs in India do not adhere uniformly to the recommended practices of MLPs for dysphagia therapy in adults.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85173571751&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85173571751&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1044/2023_JSLHR-23-00185
DO - 10.1044/2023_JSLHR-23-00185
M3 - Article
C2 - 37672783
AN - SCOPUS:85173571751
SN - 1092-4388
VL - 66
SP - 3745
EP - 3762
JO - Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR
JF - Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR
IS - 10
ER -