A synthesis of organizational learning and knowledge management literatures

Srinivasan Tatachari*, K. S. Manikandan, Srinivas Gunta

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This chapter contributes to the literature through a synthesis of the hitherto disparate organizational learning and knowledge management fields. Two distinct epistemological traditions are identified, and the literature under each tradition is synthesized separately to start with. Epistemology of possession considers knowledge as an object that can be codified, stored, retrieved, and applied to achieve organizational outcomes. One of the major contributions of this chapter is to present an integrated model of organizational learning synthesizing the frameworks of Kolb (1993), Crossan, Lane, and White (1999), and Nonaka (1994), each of which is a dominant theoretical strand within the epistemology of possession. The epistemology of practice, in contrast, assumes knowledge as an integral part of doing and as something that cannot be distinct from the process of learning. By indicating a directional attempt at synthesizing the two epistemologies themselves through the multi-faceted literature on routines, the authors make another contribution to the literature. They illustrate implications for competitive advantage throughout the chapter.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationKnowledge Management and Competitive Advantage
Subtitle of host publicationIssues and Potential Solutions
PublisherIGI Global
Pages122-147
Number of pages26
ISBN (Electronic)9781466646803
ISBN (Print)1466646799, 9781466646797
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 31-10-2013

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • General Economics,Econometrics and Finance
  • General Business,Management and Accounting

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A synthesis of organizational learning and knowledge management literatures'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this