Abstract
Prior research has identified the existence of several cross-sectional patterns in equity returns, commonly referred to as effects. This paper tests for the existence of a number of well-known effects using data from the Australian equities market. Specifically, we investigate the size effect, book-to-market effect, earnings-to-price effect, cashflow-to-price effect, leverage effect and the liquidity effect. An additional aim of this paper is to investigate the capability of the Fama-French model in explaining any observed effects. We document a size, book-to-market, earnings-to-price and cashflow-to-price effect but fail to find evidence of a leverage or liquidity effect. Although our findings indicate that the Fama-French model can partially explain some of the observed effects, we conclude that its performance is less than satisfactory in Australia.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 555-576 |
| Number of pages | 22 |
| Journal | Accounting and Finance |
| Volume | 49 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 09-2009 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Accounting
- Finance
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Anomalies and stock returns: Australian evidence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver