TY - JOUR
T1 - Assessment for learning
T2 - A needs analysis study using formative assessment to evaluate the need for curriculum reform in basic sciences
AU - Abraham, Reem Rachel
AU - Alele, Faith
AU - Kamath, Ullas
AU - Kurien, Annamma
AU - Rai, Kiranmai S.
AU - Bairy, Indira
AU - Rao, Mohandas K.G.
AU - Rao, Guruprasad
AU - Devi, Vasudha
AU - Rao, Yeshwant K.
AU - Gupta, Tarun Sen
AU - Malau-Aduli, Bunmi S.
PY - 2018/9/1
Y1 - 2018/9/1
N2 - A needs analysis study for curriculum reform in basic sciences was conducted at Melaka Manipal Medical College, India, by means of a formative assessment method, namely Basic Science Retention Examination (BSRE). Students participated in a BSRE, which comprised recall and clinical multiple-choice questions in six discipline areas. They also rated the clinical relevance of each question and provided responses to three open-text questions about the exam. Pass rates were determined; clinical relevance ratings and performance scores were compared between recall type and clinical questions to test students' level of clinical application of basic science knowledge. Text comments were thematically analyzed to identify recurring themes. Only one-third of students passed the BSRE (32.2%). Students performed better in recall questions compared with clinical questions in anatomy (51.0 vs. 40.2%), pathology (45.1 vs. 38.1%), pharmacology (41.8 vs. 31.7%), and biochemistry (43.5 vs. 26.9%). In physiology, students performed better in clinical questions compared with the recall type (56.2 vs. 45.8%). Students' response to BSRE was positive. The findings imply that transfer of basic science knowledge was poor, and that assessment methods should emphasize clinical application of basic science knowledge.
AB - A needs analysis study for curriculum reform in basic sciences was conducted at Melaka Manipal Medical College, India, by means of a formative assessment method, namely Basic Science Retention Examination (BSRE). Students participated in a BSRE, which comprised recall and clinical multiple-choice questions in six discipline areas. They also rated the clinical relevance of each question and provided responses to three open-text questions about the exam. Pass rates were determined; clinical relevance ratings and performance scores were compared between recall type and clinical questions to test students' level of clinical application of basic science knowledge. Text comments were thematically analyzed to identify recurring themes. Only one-third of students passed the BSRE (32.2%). Students performed better in recall questions compared with clinical questions in anatomy (51.0 vs. 40.2%), pathology (45.1 vs. 38.1%), pharmacology (41.8 vs. 31.7%), and biochemistry (43.5 vs. 26.9%). In physiology, students performed better in clinical questions compared with the recall type (56.2 vs. 45.8%). Students' response to BSRE was positive. The findings imply that transfer of basic science knowledge was poor, and that assessment methods should emphasize clinical application of basic science knowledge.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85052646066&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85052646066&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1152/advan.00093.2018
DO - 10.1152/advan.00093.2018
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85052646066
SN - 1043-4046
VL - 42
SP - 482
EP - 486
JO - American Journal of Physiology - Advances in Physiology Education
JF - American Journal of Physiology - Advances in Physiology Education
IS - 3
ER -