TY - JOUR
T1 - Assessment of time-related deficits in older adults
T2 - A scoping review protocol
AU - Dsouza, Sebestina Anita
AU - Ramachandran, Meena
AU - Nishiura, Yuko
AU - Venkatesh, Bhumika Tumkur
AU - Dahlberg, Lena
N1 - Funding Information:
Contributors All authors have made substantive intellectual contributions to the development of this protocol. SAD conceived the idea of this research, followed by discussions with the other authors that contributed to finalising the research idea. All authors worked on the methodology of the scoping review. SAD drafted the protocol with inputs from MR, YN and BTV, which was further reviewed and revised by LD. Funding This scoping review is part of an ongoing international research collaboration ‘Managing Time in Dementia’ funded by the Indian Council of Medical Research (54/1/GER/Indo-Sweden/17-NCD-II), India; FORTE, (FORTE 2017-00029) Sweden; and Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (B) (16K16458), Japan.
Publisher Copyright:
©
PY - 2021/9/24
Y1 - 2021/9/24
N2 - Introduction People with cognitive impairments often have difficulties in managing their time for daily activities. In older adults with cognitive impairments such as dementia and stroke, these may present as disorientation, poor time awareness, time perception, daily time management and so on. Time-related deficits and associated behaviours impede independent living and add considerably to caregiver strain. Several interventions are being investigated to help people with cognitive impairments orient and navigate time and do their daily activities. The provision of interventions requires the use of sound assessment tools. However, it is not clear how time-related concepts are specifically evaluated in practice, what are the available assessments and how these assessments should be selected. Method and analysis This protocol follows the Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewer's Manual (2020) for scoping reviews and is registered with the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/4ptgy/). We will include the following databases: PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science and PsycINFO. Two reviewers will independently screen eligible studies for inclusion against the selection criteria and then review the full-text of the selected studies. We will extract the bibliographic data, study design and setting, and details of assessments used in the studies to evaluate time-related concepts including format, mode and duration of administration, psychometric properties and so on. The identified assessments will be mapped with regard to time-related concepts being evaluated and described using narrative synthesis. Ethics and dissemination As secondary data analysis, ethics approval is not required for this scoping review. We plan to disseminate the results through peer-reviewed journals and conferences targeting health professionals working with older adults.
AB - Introduction People with cognitive impairments often have difficulties in managing their time for daily activities. In older adults with cognitive impairments such as dementia and stroke, these may present as disorientation, poor time awareness, time perception, daily time management and so on. Time-related deficits and associated behaviours impede independent living and add considerably to caregiver strain. Several interventions are being investigated to help people with cognitive impairments orient and navigate time and do their daily activities. The provision of interventions requires the use of sound assessment tools. However, it is not clear how time-related concepts are specifically evaluated in practice, what are the available assessments and how these assessments should be selected. Method and analysis This protocol follows the Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewer's Manual (2020) for scoping reviews and is registered with the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/4ptgy/). We will include the following databases: PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science and PsycINFO. Two reviewers will independently screen eligible studies for inclusion against the selection criteria and then review the full-text of the selected studies. We will extract the bibliographic data, study design and setting, and details of assessments used in the studies to evaluate time-related concepts including format, mode and duration of administration, psychometric properties and so on. The identified assessments will be mapped with regard to time-related concepts being evaluated and described using narrative synthesis. Ethics and dissemination As secondary data analysis, ethics approval is not required for this scoping review. We plan to disseminate the results through peer-reviewed journals and conferences targeting health professionals working with older adults.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85116133480&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85116133480&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050521
DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050521
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85116133480
SN - 2044-6055
VL - 11
JO - BMJ Open
JF - BMJ Open
IS - 9
M1 - e050521
ER -