TY - JOUR
T1 - Beyond the bench
T2 - LGBTQ+ health equity after India's “no same-sex marriage” verdict
AU - Weiss Goitiandia, Sofia
AU - Agarwal, Akhilesh
AU - Banerjee, Smita C.
AU - Bhoo-Pathy, Nirmala
AU - Bose, Chandan
AU - Chittem, Mahati
AU - Gursahani, Roop
AU - Ramakrishnan, L.
AU - Rana, Smriti
AU - Salins, Naveen
AU - Segarmurthy, Malar Velli
AU - Thiyam, Aashiana
AU - Rosa, William E.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Author(s)
PY - 2024/11
Y1 - 2024/11
N2 - LGBTQ+ people (e.g., lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer or questioning people) experience systemic marginalisation and discrimination globally and throughout India. In October 2023, the Indian Supreme Court rejected the legal recognition of same-sex marriage, blocking marriage equality for LGBTQ+ people and contending that the right to marry neither qualifies as a fundamental right accorded by the Indian Constitution nor falls under the Supreme Court's purview. Although the Supreme Court declared opposition to discrimination based on sexual orientation, its failure to recognise same-sex marriage legally is a substantial obstruction to full LGBTQ+ equality. We propose that the refusal of the Indian legal system to honour same-sex marriage while calling for an end to societal violence and discriminatory behaviour against the LGBTQ+ community is inherently flawed and counterintuitive. Informed by our team's multidisciplinary orientation as healthcare professionals, researchers, and advocates, we delineate explicit challenges that LGBTQ+ people in India may encounter due to the Supreme Court's recent ruling. We subsequently put forth a series of interprofessional and intersectoral recommendations to mitigate this decision's immediate and long-term consequences, providing an actionable path toward LGBTQ+ inclusion, justice, and equity in India.
AB - LGBTQ+ people (e.g., lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer or questioning people) experience systemic marginalisation and discrimination globally and throughout India. In October 2023, the Indian Supreme Court rejected the legal recognition of same-sex marriage, blocking marriage equality for LGBTQ+ people and contending that the right to marry neither qualifies as a fundamental right accorded by the Indian Constitution nor falls under the Supreme Court's purview. Although the Supreme Court declared opposition to discrimination based on sexual orientation, its failure to recognise same-sex marriage legally is a substantial obstruction to full LGBTQ+ equality. We propose that the refusal of the Indian legal system to honour same-sex marriage while calling for an end to societal violence and discriminatory behaviour against the LGBTQ+ community is inherently flawed and counterintuitive. Informed by our team's multidisciplinary orientation as healthcare professionals, researchers, and advocates, we delineate explicit challenges that LGBTQ+ people in India may encounter due to the Supreme Court's recent ruling. We subsequently put forth a series of interprofessional and intersectoral recommendations to mitigate this decision's immediate and long-term consequences, providing an actionable path toward LGBTQ+ inclusion, justice, and equity in India.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85205708624
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85205708624#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1016/j.lansea.2024.100494
DO - 10.1016/j.lansea.2024.100494
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85205708624
SN - 2772-3682
VL - 30
JO - The Lancet Regional Health - Southeast Asia
JF - The Lancet Regional Health - Southeast Asia
M1 - 100494
ER -