TY - JOUR
T1 - Biomechanical Stress Analysis of Platform Switch Implants of Varying Diameters on Different Densities of Bone
AU - Mukherjee, Sandipan
AU - Rodrigues, Shobha
AU - Mahesh, M.
AU - Shetty, Thilak
AU - Pai, Umesh
AU - Saldanha, Sharon
AU - Hedge, Puneeth
AU - Kamath, Vignesh
AU - Sales, Ann
AU - Bajantri, Prashanth
N1 - Copyright © 2022 Sandipan Mukherjee et al.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Purpose. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the strain developed in D2 and D3 types of bones on vertical loading by platform switch implants of different diameters. Materials and Methods. Implants of diameters 3.25 mm, 4.2 mm, and 5.0 mm and of length 11.5 mm were taken and placed each on D2 and D3 bone models. Strain gauges were attached on the buccal and the lingual sides on each of these samples, and a vertical load of 190N was placed on the samples. The strain was recorded using a data logger. The data obtained was analysed using one-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey test. Results. In D2 and D3 bone models, 3.25 mm significantly showed greater bone strain values. The buccal side strain was higher irrespective of the implant diameter and density of bone. Conclusion. Within the limitations of the study, it may be concluded that the narrow diameter implant produces greater strain than 4.2 and 5.0 mm diameter implants, respectively. The buccal side consistently produced higher bone strain values.
AB - Purpose. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the strain developed in D2 and D3 types of bones on vertical loading by platform switch implants of different diameters. Materials and Methods. Implants of diameters 3.25 mm, 4.2 mm, and 5.0 mm and of length 11.5 mm were taken and placed each on D2 and D3 bone models. Strain gauges were attached on the buccal and the lingual sides on each of these samples, and a vertical load of 190N was placed on the samples. The strain was recorded using a data logger. The data obtained was analysed using one-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey test. Results. In D2 and D3 bone models, 3.25 mm significantly showed greater bone strain values. The buccal side strain was higher irrespective of the implant diameter and density of bone. Conclusion. Within the limitations of the study, it may be concluded that the narrow diameter implant produces greater strain than 4.2 and 5.0 mm diameter implants, respectively. The buccal side consistently produced higher bone strain values.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85126350605&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85126350605&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1155/2022/5972259
DO - 10.1155/2022/5972259
M3 - Article
C2 - 35251181
AN - SCOPUS:85126350605
SN - 1687-8728
VL - 2022
SP - 5972259
JO - International Journal of Dentistry
JF - International Journal of Dentistry
M1 - 5972259
ER -