Bladder adenocarcinoma: A persisting diagnostic dilemma

Geetha Vasudevan, Arijit Bishnu, Brij Mohan Kumar Singh, M. Deepak Nayak, Pooja Jain

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


Primary urinary Bladder Adenocarcinoma (PBA) is an uncommon neoplasm and can cause diagnostic difficulties due to histologic similarities with adenocarcinomas of adjacent structures like Gastrointestinal Tract (GIT) and prostate, since involvement of the bladder by metastasis or direct spread can occur. Seven cases of bladder adenocarcinomas were diagnosed during a period of four years in a tertiary care hospital. Patient’s age ranged from 26-78 years with a male predilection. Three cases were signet ring type adenocarcinomas, two cases were subtyped as enteric variant, one as mucinous variant and one as adenocarcinoma Not Otherwise Specified (NOS) variant. One case showed urachal involvement. Common site of involvement was the base and posterior wall of the bladder. Three cases had prior history of GIT malignancy. No morphologic difference was identified to differentiate primary from secondary adenocarcinomas. Bladder adenocarcinoma is rare tumours. Primary and secondary adenocarcinomas cannot be distinguished from each other on morphologic grounds. Ancillary studies may have limited role in distinguishing between the two. Hence, clinical correlation has a major role in their evaluation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)ER01-ER04
JournalJournal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 01-03-2017

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Clinical Biochemistry


Dive into the research topics of 'Bladder adenocarcinoma: A persisting diagnostic dilemma'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this