Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

China’s semiconductor conundrum: understanding US export controls and their efficacy

  • Megha Shrivastava
  • , Amrita Jash*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    This article discusses the evolution of the US–China tech rivalry from Trump’s first term to the Biden administration and examines the efficacy of US export control measures. To highlight the changing relevance of traditional economic statecraft tools such as export controls, the article explores the tech rivalry through three key objectives. First, it analyzes how the dynamics of hegemonic competition between the US and China have evolved, particularly in light of their economic and military dependence on Taiwan’s semiconductor industry. Second, it reviews the state of China’s semiconductor sector and assesses how American export control policies are reshaping the Chinese chip industry. Third, the article evaluates the effectiveness of US sanctions on China, identifying four key ways in which Chinese chipmakers have managed to circumvent these measures. The paper argues that America’s chokepoint strategy is increasingly proving to be a fallacy, as US policies have inadvertently accelerated China’s push for domestic innovation in high-tech sectors. This trend exposes a structural flaw in the conventional geoeconomic strategy of export controls, as global supply chains appear to be less controllable by US-led policies. It reflects a broader strategic realignment with deeper implications for global power dynamics.

    Original languageEnglish
    Article number2528450
    JournalCogent Social Sciences
    Volume11
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2025

    All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

    • General Social Sciences

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'China’s semiconductor conundrum: understanding US export controls and their efficacy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this