Abstract
Objectives: Proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) has often been used as a marker to aid assessment of tumour growth fraction. This paper addresses the question of whether it can be used as an S-phase marker, when the non-chromatin-bound form of the protein is removed by pepsin treatment.Materials and methods: Cytofluorometric measurements were carried out after immunofluorescence staining of PCNA and counterstaining of DNA. S-phase fraction was determined with the help of windows on PCNA versus DNA scattergrams, or mathematically from DNA histograms.Results: S-phase fractions obtained using the two methods correlated well, but did not always agree, exact discrepancies depending on the mathematical model used for histogram analysis.Conclusions: Determination of S-phase fractions with the help of PCNA immunofluorescence staining is possible, and probably more reliable than calculation of S-fractions from DNA histograms. It thus offers an alternative to assays involving BrdU labelling in vivo.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 579-583 |
Number of pages | 5 |
Journal | Cell Proliferation |
Volume | 43 |
Issue number | 6 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 01-12-2010 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Cell Biology