TY - JOUR
T1 - Chronic adaptations to blood flow restriction aerobic or bodyweight resistance training
T2 - A systematic review
AU - Bommasamudram, Tulasiram
AU - Morrell, Zoe G.
AU - Clarkson, Matthew J.
AU - Nayak, Kirtana Raghurama
AU - Kadavigere, Rajagopal
AU - Russell, Aaron P.
AU - Warmington, Stuart A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - This systematic review aimed to examine the chronic adaptations of blood flow restriction (BFR) in conjunction with aerobic and bodyweight resistance training. A search of the electronic databases PubMed (MEDLINE), CINAHL, SPORTDiscus® (via EBSCOhost), Embase, and Cochrane (Central) was conducted to identify relevant published studies. The inclusion criteria encompassed a healthy adult sample population (>18 years), original studies, chronic exercise training interventions (minimum 2 weeks duration) employing aerobic BFR exercise or bodyweight resistance BFR exercise, and comparisons with equivalent intensity non-BFR aerobic or bodyweight resistance training. Thirty-three (n = 33) studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the review. Among the included studies, chronic adaptations to BFR aerobic training were characterized by significant improvements in aerobic capacity (4–9%), muscle strength (6–31%), and muscle hypertrophy (2–11%) compared to non-BFR aerobic training. Furthermore, bodyweight resistance BFR training increased muscle hypertrophy (3–5%) and strength (4–11%). The findings suggest that both aerobic and bodyweight BFR training provide interchangeable options for practitioners prescribing BFR without access to a traditional equipment filled training environment, supporting flexibility in exercise programme design tailored to individual preferences, facility constraints, and specific fitness goals.
AB - This systematic review aimed to examine the chronic adaptations of blood flow restriction (BFR) in conjunction with aerobic and bodyweight resistance training. A search of the electronic databases PubMed (MEDLINE), CINAHL, SPORTDiscus® (via EBSCOhost), Embase, and Cochrane (Central) was conducted to identify relevant published studies. The inclusion criteria encompassed a healthy adult sample population (>18 years), original studies, chronic exercise training interventions (minimum 2 weeks duration) employing aerobic BFR exercise or bodyweight resistance BFR exercise, and comparisons with equivalent intensity non-BFR aerobic or bodyweight resistance training. Thirty-three (n = 33) studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the review. Among the included studies, chronic adaptations to BFR aerobic training were characterized by significant improvements in aerobic capacity (4–9%), muscle strength (6–31%), and muscle hypertrophy (2–11%) compared to non-BFR aerobic training. Furthermore, bodyweight resistance BFR training increased muscle hypertrophy (3–5%) and strength (4–11%). The findings suggest that both aerobic and bodyweight BFR training provide interchangeable options for practitioners prescribing BFR without access to a traditional equipment filled training environment, supporting flexibility in exercise programme design tailored to individual preferences, facility constraints, and specific fitness goals.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/86000449014
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=86000449014&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/02640414.2025.2474346
DO - 10.1080/02640414.2025.2474346
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:86000449014
SN - 0264-0414
VL - 43
SP - 2241
EP - 2255
JO - Journal of Sports Sciences
JF - Journal of Sports Sciences
IS - 19
ER -