Abstract
The classical Indian variety of history may be called ‘istory’. It is not completely true that no real importance was attached to istory in classical India. But much of oral istorical literature is lost since—perhaps—narrating istory was considered a performance. Unlike historical narratives, istorical narratives are presentative, not representative. Istory can be understood as a system of narrating past events that has a purpose and poetic beauty. Finally, the paper will argue that istory is based on cognitive tools of two types: epistemic tools such as testimony, inference, tarka and aesthetic tools. Thus, it has a hybrid cognitive method.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 237-248 |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| Journal | Journal of Indian Council of Philosophical Research |
| Volume | 39 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Accepted/In press - 2023 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Philosophy
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Cognitive Tools for Narrating the Past: A Study of Classical India'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver