TY - JOUR
T1 - Collective mindfulness research
T2 - gap-spotting and problematization
AU - Chatterjee, Aniruddha
AU - Bruce, Kyle
AU - Thakur, Munish
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025, Emerald Publishing Limited.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Purpose: Ample research has explored the benefits of mindfulness in organizations. However, research in the sub-stream of collective mindfulness remains nascent. Though the diverse conceptualizations of collective mindfulness add richness to our understanding, a lack of specificity, imprecise definitions and flexible interpretations impede research progress. This paper identifies the discrepancies, gaps and inconsistencies that need scholarly attention for advancing research. Design/methodology/approach: Reviewing the literature and using a combination of gap-spotting and problematization approaches, this conceptual paper seeks to unveil the theoretical issues and discrepancies that must be addressed for progressing research in this captivating area. Findings: The study highlights several research gaps and questionable assumptions in the current understanding and operationalization of collective mindfulness and emphasizes the need for a careful examination of the extant conceptualizations. It also suggests potential avenues for future research, which in turn, can guide the application of mindfulness in organizations. Originality/value: This study presents a critical philosophical inquiry into the debatable and under-addressed aspects of the extant research on collective mindfulness. While several review studies have investigated the mindfulness concept, this is among the first review papers focusing exclusively on “collective” mindfulness. Insights from this study can inform future empirical studies in this burgeoning area of research.
AB - Purpose: Ample research has explored the benefits of mindfulness in organizations. However, research in the sub-stream of collective mindfulness remains nascent. Though the diverse conceptualizations of collective mindfulness add richness to our understanding, a lack of specificity, imprecise definitions and flexible interpretations impede research progress. This paper identifies the discrepancies, gaps and inconsistencies that need scholarly attention for advancing research. Design/methodology/approach: Reviewing the literature and using a combination of gap-spotting and problematization approaches, this conceptual paper seeks to unveil the theoretical issues and discrepancies that must be addressed for progressing research in this captivating area. Findings: The study highlights several research gaps and questionable assumptions in the current understanding and operationalization of collective mindfulness and emphasizes the need for a careful examination of the extant conceptualizations. It also suggests potential avenues for future research, which in turn, can guide the application of mindfulness in organizations. Originality/value: This study presents a critical philosophical inquiry into the debatable and under-addressed aspects of the extant research on collective mindfulness. While several review studies have investigated the mindfulness concept, this is among the first review papers focusing exclusively on “collective” mindfulness. Insights from this study can inform future empirical studies in this burgeoning area of research.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105001148974
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105001148974#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1108/MD-12-2023-2253
DO - 10.1108/MD-12-2023-2253
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105001148974
SN - 0025-1747
JO - Management Decision
JF - Management Decision
ER -