Community perceptions of postmortem examination and minimally invasive tissue sampling in neonates:a qualitative study in South India

Athira Sreenivas, Teddy Andrews Jaihind Jothikaran, Leslie Lewis, Mary Mathew*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Postmortem examination is the gold standard for establishing the cause of death. Minimally Invasive Tissue Sampling (MITS) of organs is a novel approach that can be used as an alternative to postmortem examination. In this study, the community perceptions in two states in South India towards neonatal postmortem and the acceptance towards the MITS technique is studied. Methods: In-depth interviews were conducted among the participants from Kerala and Karnataka to understand the perception towards postmortem and the acceptance of the novel MITS technique. The interviews were audio recorded, and a thematic analysis was done to identify the overarching themes and codes. Results: The knowledge and attitude of participants on conventional and MITS postmortem techniques, reasons for refusal, and the need for raising awareness were identified in the study. Participants favored the MITS techniques as it was less disfiguring and less time-consuming. The major concerns for refusal of conventional postmortem were that the procedure was disfiguring, time-consuming, and caused emotional stress to the parents. Conclusions: Participants favored the MITS approach over conventional postmortem as it caused less disfigurement and was conducive to the religious practice of burial of the body.

Original languageEnglish
Article number804
JournalBMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Volume23
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 12-2023

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Community perceptions of postmortem examination and minimally invasive tissue sampling in neonates:a qualitative study in South India'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this