TY - GEN
T1 - Comparative analysis of dual active bridge isolated DC to DC converter with flyback converters for bidirectional energy transfer
AU - Kumar, Anupam
AU - Bhat, A. H.
AU - Agarwal, Pramod
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 IEEE.
PY - 2018/5/11
Y1 - 2018/5/11
N2 - Bidirectional energy transfer capability is the central part of a lot of modern power conversion systems. Preferably, for reduction of size, weight and cost these systems use a single high efficiency power electronic conversion system. A dual active bridge converter having two DC-AC converters connected back to back through an AC inductor/transformer is a common topology used for obtaining high efficiency bidirectional power conversion. Some characteristic features of the DAB converter topology are bidirectional power flow capability, inherent soft switching, high power density, high efficiency, galvanic isolation and low number of passive components. In this paper, comparative study of Dual active bridge converter is done with flyback converters. Also efficiency of these converters are compared. Switching of devices for the two converters is also shown. Flyback converter is operated in both buck as well as boost mode. DAB is simulated in SPS (Single phase shift) mode.
AB - Bidirectional energy transfer capability is the central part of a lot of modern power conversion systems. Preferably, for reduction of size, weight and cost these systems use a single high efficiency power electronic conversion system. A dual active bridge converter having two DC-AC converters connected back to back through an AC inductor/transformer is a common topology used for obtaining high efficiency bidirectional power conversion. Some characteristic features of the DAB converter topology are bidirectional power flow capability, inherent soft switching, high power density, high efficiency, galvanic isolation and low number of passive components. In this paper, comparative study of Dual active bridge converter is done with flyback converters. Also efficiency of these converters are compared. Switching of devices for the two converters is also shown. Flyback converter is operated in both buck as well as boost mode. DAB is simulated in SPS (Single phase shift) mode.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85048043050
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85048043050#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1109/RDCAPE.2017.8358301
DO - 10.1109/RDCAPE.2017.8358301
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85048043050
T3 - 2017 Recent Developments in Control, Automation and Power Engineering, RDCAPE 2017
SP - 382
EP - 387
BT - 2017 Recent Developments in Control, Automation and Power Engineering, RDCAPE 2017
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
T2 - 2017 Recent Developments in Control, Automation and Power Engineering, RDCAPE 2017
Y2 - 26 October 2017 through 27 October 2017
ER -