TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparative Evaluation of the Microleakage of Two Bonding Systems Pretreated with Chitosan Nanoparticles and Restored with Composite Resin
T2 - An In Vitro Study †
AU - Thomas, Aleena Ann
AU - Shenoy, Neetha
AU - Kini, Sandya
AU - Somayaji, Krishnaraj
AU - Mujawar, Asiya
AU - Hegde, Vivek
AU - Acharya, Shahsirashmi
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 by the authors.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Class II cavity preparation was conducted on 84 recently extracted premolars. Group I consisted of teeth restored with composite and without adhesive, (n = 12). Group II consisted of teeth restored with composite using prime and bond universal adhesive (n = 36). Group III teeth were restored with composites with Scotchbond universal adhesive (n = 36). Group II and III (n = 18 each) were further subdivided into chitosan pretreated and non-pretreated groups and named as II a, II b, III a, and III b, respectively. Microleakage was tested using the fluid filtration model. The mean microleakage was least for the prime and bond universal groups pretreated with chitosan (0.00145 and 0.00205) at both time periods. This was followed by the Scotchbond universal group pretreated with chitosan group (0.00149 and 0.00203). This was followed by the prime and bond without pretreatment with chitosan groups (0.00229 and 0.00225).
AB - Class II cavity preparation was conducted on 84 recently extracted premolars. Group I consisted of teeth restored with composite and without adhesive, (n = 12). Group II consisted of teeth restored with composite using prime and bond universal adhesive (n = 36). Group III teeth were restored with composites with Scotchbond universal adhesive (n = 36). Group II and III (n = 18 each) were further subdivided into chitosan pretreated and non-pretreated groups and named as II a, II b, III a, and III b, respectively. Microleakage was tested using the fluid filtration model. The mean microleakage was least for the prime and bond universal groups pretreated with chitosan (0.00145 and 0.00205) at both time periods. This was followed by the Scotchbond universal group pretreated with chitosan group (0.00149 and 0.00203). This was followed by the prime and bond without pretreatment with chitosan groups (0.00229 and 0.00225).
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85186459351&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85186459351&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/engproc2023059110
DO - 10.3390/engproc2023059110
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85186459351
SN - 2673-4591
VL - 59
JO - Engineering Proceedings
JF - Engineering Proceedings
IS - 1
M1 - 110
ER -