TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison of static postural sway characteristics between pregnant and non-pregnant women
AU - Ramachandra, Preetha
AU - Kumar, Pratap
AU - Bø, Kari
AU - Arun Maiya, G.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2023/6
Y1 - 2023/6
N2 - The present study aimed to compare the postural sway between pregnant and non-pregnant women during eight different sensory conditions including those in which vision, proprioception, and base of support are compromised. Forty primigravidae at the 32nd week of pregnancy and forty non-pregnant women who were matched for age and anthropometric measurements participated in this cross-sectional comparison study. Static posturography equipment was used to record the anteroposterior sway velocity, mediolateral sway velocity, and velocity moment during normal stance and when vision, proprioception, and base of support were compromised. Pregnant women (mean age: 25.4) demonstrated a larger median velocity moment and mean anteroposterior sway velocity compared to non–pregnant women (mean age:24.4) across all tested sensory conditions (p < 0.05). Although mediolateral sway velocity did not show any statistically significant difference, the ANCOVA results suggested that there was a statistically significant difference in mediolateral sway velocity in Eyes open feet apart condition on the firm surface [F (1,77, p = 0.030, ηp2 = 0.121] and Eyes closed feet apart condition on the firm surface [F (1,77, p = 0.015, ηp2 = 0.15] between pregnant and non-pregnant women. There was a larger velocity moment and anteroposterior postural sway velocity in pregnant women in their third trimester compared to non-pregnant women when exposed to different sensory conditions. Title: Comparison of static postural sway characteristics between pregnant and non-pregnant women.
AB - The present study aimed to compare the postural sway between pregnant and non-pregnant women during eight different sensory conditions including those in which vision, proprioception, and base of support are compromised. Forty primigravidae at the 32nd week of pregnancy and forty non-pregnant women who were matched for age and anthropometric measurements participated in this cross-sectional comparison study. Static posturography equipment was used to record the anteroposterior sway velocity, mediolateral sway velocity, and velocity moment during normal stance and when vision, proprioception, and base of support were compromised. Pregnant women (mean age: 25.4) demonstrated a larger median velocity moment and mean anteroposterior sway velocity compared to non–pregnant women (mean age:24.4) across all tested sensory conditions (p < 0.05). Although mediolateral sway velocity did not show any statistically significant difference, the ANCOVA results suggested that there was a statistically significant difference in mediolateral sway velocity in Eyes open feet apart condition on the firm surface [F (1,77, p = 0.030, ηp2 = 0.121] and Eyes closed feet apart condition on the firm surface [F (1,77, p = 0.015, ηp2 = 0.15] between pregnant and non-pregnant women. There was a larger velocity moment and anteroposterior postural sway velocity in pregnant women in their third trimester compared to non-pregnant women when exposed to different sensory conditions. Title: Comparison of static postural sway characteristics between pregnant and non-pregnant women.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85159340326&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85159340326&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2023.111618
DO - 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2023.111618
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85159340326
SN - 0021-9290
VL - 154
JO - Journal of Biomechanics
JF - Journal of Biomechanics
M1 - 111618
ER -