TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison of two high dose rate intracavitary brachytherapy regimens in treatment of cervical cancer
T2 - a preliminary report
AU - Krishna, Abhishek
AU - Hasib, Ag
AU - Fernandes, Donald
AU - Athiyamaan, M. S.
AU - Rao, Sandesh
AU - Shankar, Sharaschandra
AU - Ali, Mohsina
AU - Priyadarshini, Hepsiba
AU - Sophia, Maria
AU - Shridhar, Ch
AU - George, Seby
AU - Babu, Amrutha
AU - Banerjee, Sourjya
AU - Sunny, Johan
AU - Srinivas, Challapalli
AU - Lobo, Dilson
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, The Author(s).
PY - 2023/12
Y1 - 2023/12
N2 - Background: To assess and compare the local control and toxicities between HDR Intracavitary Brachytherapy with 7.5 Gy and 9 Gy per fraction after EBRT in treatment of carcinoma cervix. Methodology: A total of 180 patients were randomly assigned to 2 arms. Arm A received HDR intracavitary brachytherapy with a dose of 7.5 Gy per fraction, 1 fraction per week for 3 fractions and Arm B received 9 Gy per fraction, 1 fraction per week for 2 fractions. Patients were evaluated on follow up for assessment of local control and toxicities. Results: The median follow up was 12 months (6–18 months). In arm A 89% of the patient had complete response and 11% had recurrence or metastasis. In arm B 93% of the patient had complete response and 7% had recurrence or metastasis. Grade 2/3 diarrhoea was seen in 4.4% of patients in Arm A and in 7.7% in Arm B. Grade 2/3 proctitis was seen in 3.3% of patients in 7.5 Gy arm and in 6.6% in 9 Gy arm. One patient in each arm had grade 1 haematuria. The overall duration of treatment was significant lower in Arm B compared to Arm A (59 days vs 68 days, p = 0.01). Conclusion: The result of this clinical study shows that Intracavitary brachytherapy with a dose of 9 Gy per fraction is non inferior to other schedules in term of local control and does not result in increased toxicity.
AB - Background: To assess and compare the local control and toxicities between HDR Intracavitary Brachytherapy with 7.5 Gy and 9 Gy per fraction after EBRT in treatment of carcinoma cervix. Methodology: A total of 180 patients were randomly assigned to 2 arms. Arm A received HDR intracavitary brachytherapy with a dose of 7.5 Gy per fraction, 1 fraction per week for 3 fractions and Arm B received 9 Gy per fraction, 1 fraction per week for 2 fractions. Patients were evaluated on follow up for assessment of local control and toxicities. Results: The median follow up was 12 months (6–18 months). In arm A 89% of the patient had complete response and 11% had recurrence or metastasis. In arm B 93% of the patient had complete response and 7% had recurrence or metastasis. Grade 2/3 diarrhoea was seen in 4.4% of patients in Arm A and in 7.7% in Arm B. Grade 2/3 proctitis was seen in 3.3% of patients in 7.5 Gy arm and in 6.6% in 9 Gy arm. One patient in each arm had grade 1 haematuria. The overall duration of treatment was significant lower in Arm B compared to Arm A (59 days vs 68 days, p = 0.01). Conclusion: The result of this clinical study shows that Intracavitary brachytherapy with a dose of 9 Gy per fraction is non inferior to other schedules in term of local control and does not result in increased toxicity.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85151441367&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85151441367&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s12672-023-00646-x
DO - 10.1007/s12672-023-00646-x
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85151441367
SN - 1868-8497
VL - 14
JO - Discover Oncology
JF - Discover Oncology
IS - 1
M1 - 33
ER -