Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Cross-national research on adolescent mental health: a systematic review comparing research in low, middle and high-income countries

  • Xiao Zhang
  • , Yuko Mori*
  • , Anne Abio
  • , Zahra Kafami Khorasani
  • , Sonja Gilbert
  • , Meytal Grimland
  • , Nikita Bezborodovs
  • , Wan Mohd Azam Wan Mohd Yunus
  • , Sanju Silwal
  • , Minja Westerlund
  • , Samir Kumar Praharaj
  • , David M. Ndetei
  • , Hitoshi Kaneko
  • , Emmi Heinonen
  • , Andre Sourander
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Background Although 90% of the global adolescent population resides in low and middle-income countries (LMICs), cross-national mental health research has primarily focused on high-income countries. This systematic review aims to examine cross-national studies, including LMICs, focusing on adolescent mental health and psychosocial problems. Methods Peer-reviewed articles comparing adolescent mental health or psychosocial issues across countries were included if published in English and based on observational study designs. Six databases were searched from inception to January 2024. Risk of bias was assessed using the JBI tool and additional cross-national quality criteria. A narrative synthesis was conducted following the Synthesis Without Meta-analysis guidelines. Results The search identified 172 studies including data from over 12 million adolescents across 166 countries. The most used international survey was the Health Behaviour in School-aged Children study, and most studies employed cross-sectional designs with school-based, self-reported questionnaires. Adolescent mental health research involved 166 countries, while 52 countries were not represented in any of the studies. The inclusion of LMICs in cross-national research increased over time. Internalising problems and bullying were well-researched topics, but studies on externalising behaviours were limited. The number of publications increased over time, particularly after 2020. Variations by income level were observed, with traditional bullying more prevalent in LMICs. Discussion This review provides important insights into global patterns and gaps in adolescent mental health research. It highlights the need to address methodological heterogeneity, including the use of validated and culturally adapted measures, comprehensive reporting of sampling procedures, sample sizes, response rates and greater attention to generalisability. In addition, the targeted inclusion of under-represented regions is essential to addressing global disparities and informing effective interventions. PROSPERO registration number CRD42024505077.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere019267
JournalMount Sinai Journal of Medicine
Volume10
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 25-07-2025

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Health Policy
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cross-national research on adolescent mental health: a systematic review comparing research in low, middle and high-income countries'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this