Definition, treatment and outcome of residual fragments in staghorn stones

Osman Ermis, Bhaskar Somani, Thomas Reeves, Selcuk Guven, Pilar Laguna Pes, Arun Chawla, Padmaraj Hegde, Jean de la Rosette

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)


Technological advances in minimally invasive treatment of stone disease and its integration with concomitant clinical practice are amongst the most important achievements in urology. Despite the wealth of information accumulated over the years and the richness of existing literature, the knowledge about the definition, treatment and outcomes of residual stone fragments after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) is still insufficient. Due to the high stone load a lot of patients with staghorn stones have residual fragments (RFs) after treatment with PNL, which depends on the size of tract, definition of stone free rate (SFR), timing of evaluation and the imaging used. No consensus exists on the imaging modality or their timing in the evaluation of possible RFs. The treatment of residual stones is apparently different depending on the facilities of the department and the preference of the surgeon, which includes active surveillance, shock wave lithotripsy (SWL), retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) or a second look PNL.

Original languageEnglish
JournalAsian Journal of Urology
Publication statusPublished - 01-04-2020

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Urology


Dive into the research topics of 'Definition, treatment and outcome of residual fragments in staghorn stones'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this