TY - JOUR
T1 - Definition, treatment and outcome of residual fragments in staghorn stones
AU - Ermis, Osman
AU - Somani, Bhaskar
AU - Reeves, Thomas
AU - Guven, Selcuk
AU - Pes, Pilar Laguna
AU - Chawla, Arun
AU - Hegde, Padmaraj
AU - de la Rosette, Jean
PY - 2020/4/1
Y1 - 2020/4/1
N2 - Technological advances in minimally invasive treatment of stone disease and its integration with concomitant clinical practice are amongst the most important achievements in urology. Despite the wealth of information accumulated over the years and the richness of existing literature, the knowledge about the definition, treatment and outcomes of residual stone fragments after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) is still insufficient. Due to the high stone load a lot of patients with staghorn stones have residual fragments (RFs) after treatment with PNL, which depends on the size of tract, definition of stone free rate (SFR), timing of evaluation and the imaging used. No consensus exists on the imaging modality or their timing in the evaluation of possible RFs. The treatment of residual stones is apparently different depending on the facilities of the department and the preference of the surgeon, which includes active surveillance, shock wave lithotripsy (SWL), retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) or a second look PNL.
AB - Technological advances in minimally invasive treatment of stone disease and its integration with concomitant clinical practice are amongst the most important achievements in urology. Despite the wealth of information accumulated over the years and the richness of existing literature, the knowledge about the definition, treatment and outcomes of residual stone fragments after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) is still insufficient. Due to the high stone load a lot of patients with staghorn stones have residual fragments (RFs) after treatment with PNL, which depends on the size of tract, definition of stone free rate (SFR), timing of evaluation and the imaging used. No consensus exists on the imaging modality or their timing in the evaluation of possible RFs. The treatment of residual stones is apparently different depending on the facilities of the department and the preference of the surgeon, which includes active surveillance, shock wave lithotripsy (SWL), retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) or a second look PNL.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85078455556&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85078455556&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ajur.2019.12.013
DO - 10.1016/j.ajur.2019.12.013
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85078455556
SN - 2214-3882
JO - Asian Journal of Urology
JF - Asian Journal of Urology
ER -