TY - JOUR
T1 - Delayed correct diagnoses in emerging disease outbreaks
T2 - historical patterns and lessons for contemporary responses
AU - Pellejero-Sagastizábal, Galadriel
AU - Bulescu, Casandra
AU - Gupta, Nitin
AU - Jokelainen, Pikka
AU - Gkrania-Klotsas, Effrossyni
AU - Barac, Aleksandra
AU - Goorhuis, Abraham
AU - Jacob, Shevin T.
AU - Agnandji, Selidji T.
AU - Ntoumi, Francine
AU - Mora-Rillo, Marta
AU - Paño-Pardo, José Ramón
AU - Lescure, F. Xavier
AU - Grobusch, Martin P.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s)
PY - 2025/8
Y1 - 2025/8
N2 - Background: The gap between early diagnostic assumptions and final diagnoses in disease outbreaks represents a persistent challenge in global health despite advancements in diagnostic and response capabilities. Objectives: To analyse the unfolding 2025 outbreak in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) through the lens of historical cases where initial misattributions contributed to delayed recognition of novel or unexpected threats with varying public health consequences; identifying patterns from past outbreaks that can inform current diagnostic approaches and response strategies. Sources: We selected illustrative examples from peer-reviewed publications, focusing on cases with initial diagnostic uncertainties that highlight specific diagnostic patterns relevant to the current DRC outbreak. For the ongoing DRC outbreak, we analysed official World Health Organization Africa bulletins and communications from the DRC Ministry of Health through February and early March 2025. Content: As of beginning of April 2025, health authorities continue investigating clusters of unexplained acute febrile illness in Équateur Province with clinical features that were initially being suggestive of a viral haemorrhagic fever. Primary viral haemorrhagic fever pathogens have now been excluded. From selected historical and recent outbreaks, it can be deduced that diagnostic challenges extend beyond individual cognition to include structural biases in global health systems, methodological limitations and sociocultural factors. Implications: We identified five evidence-informed interventions to mitigate diagnostic delays: systematic consideration of multiple working hypotheses, development of sustainable local diagnostic capacity, enhancement of clinician-to-public-health communication networks, implementation of cognitive debiasing strategies, and strengthening of One Health surveillance platforms. Historical misdiagnoses offer crucial lessons for transforming outbreak response from reactive to anticipatory, potentially averting future epidemics through earlier, more accurate recognition of emerging pathogens within their complex ecological and social contexts.
AB - Background: The gap between early diagnostic assumptions and final diagnoses in disease outbreaks represents a persistent challenge in global health despite advancements in diagnostic and response capabilities. Objectives: To analyse the unfolding 2025 outbreak in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) through the lens of historical cases where initial misattributions contributed to delayed recognition of novel or unexpected threats with varying public health consequences; identifying patterns from past outbreaks that can inform current diagnostic approaches and response strategies. Sources: We selected illustrative examples from peer-reviewed publications, focusing on cases with initial diagnostic uncertainties that highlight specific diagnostic patterns relevant to the current DRC outbreak. For the ongoing DRC outbreak, we analysed official World Health Organization Africa bulletins and communications from the DRC Ministry of Health through February and early March 2025. Content: As of beginning of April 2025, health authorities continue investigating clusters of unexplained acute febrile illness in Équateur Province with clinical features that were initially being suggestive of a viral haemorrhagic fever. Primary viral haemorrhagic fever pathogens have now been excluded. From selected historical and recent outbreaks, it can be deduced that diagnostic challenges extend beyond individual cognition to include structural biases in global health systems, methodological limitations and sociocultural factors. Implications: We identified five evidence-informed interventions to mitigate diagnostic delays: systematic consideration of multiple working hypotheses, development of sustainable local diagnostic capacity, enhancement of clinician-to-public-health communication networks, implementation of cognitive debiasing strategies, and strengthening of One Health surveillance platforms. Historical misdiagnoses offer crucial lessons for transforming outbreak response from reactive to anticipatory, potentially averting future epidemics through earlier, more accurate recognition of emerging pathogens within their complex ecological and social contexts.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105003978049
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105003978049#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1016/j.cmi.2025.04.007
DO - 10.1016/j.cmi.2025.04.007
M3 - Review article
C2 - 40222556
AN - SCOPUS:105003978049
SN - 1198-743X
VL - 31
SP - 1298
EP - 1306
JO - Clinical Microbiology and Infection
JF - Clinical Microbiology and Infection
IS - 8
ER -