Delayed correct diagnoses in emerging disease outbreaks: historical patterns and lessons for contemporary responses

  • Galadriel Pellejero-Sagastizábal
  • , Casandra Bulescu
  • , Nitin Gupta
  • , Pikka Jokelainen
  • , Effrossyni Gkrania-Klotsas
  • , Aleksandra Barac
  • , Abraham Goorhuis
  • , Shevin T. Jacob
  • , Selidji T. Agnandji
  • , Francine Ntoumi
  • , Marta Mora-Rillo
  • , José Ramón Paño-Pardo
  • , F. Xavier Lescure
  • , Martin P. Grobusch*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The gap between early diagnostic assumptions and final diagnoses in disease outbreaks represents a persistent challenge in global health despite advancements in diagnostic and response capabilities. Objectives: To analyse the unfolding 2025 outbreak in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) through the lens of historical cases where initial misattributions contributed to delayed recognition of novel or unexpected threats with varying public health consequences; identifying patterns from past outbreaks that can inform current diagnostic approaches and response strategies. Sources: We selected illustrative examples from peer-reviewed publications, focusing on cases with initial diagnostic uncertainties that highlight specific diagnostic patterns relevant to the current DRC outbreak. For the ongoing DRC outbreak, we analysed official World Health Organization Africa bulletins and communications from the DRC Ministry of Health through February and early March 2025. Content: As of beginning of April 2025, health authorities continue investigating clusters of unexplained acute febrile illness in Équateur Province with clinical features that were initially being suggestive of a viral haemorrhagic fever. Primary viral haemorrhagic fever pathogens have now been excluded. From selected historical and recent outbreaks, it can be deduced that diagnostic challenges extend beyond individual cognition to include structural biases in global health systems, methodological limitations and sociocultural factors. Implications: We identified five evidence-informed interventions to mitigate diagnostic delays: systematic consideration of multiple working hypotheses, development of sustainable local diagnostic capacity, enhancement of clinician-to-public-health communication networks, implementation of cognitive debiasing strategies, and strengthening of One Health surveillance platforms. Historical misdiagnoses offer crucial lessons for transforming outbreak response from reactive to anticipatory, potentially averting future epidemics through earlier, more accurate recognition of emerging pathogens within their complex ecological and social contexts.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1298-1306
Number of pages9
JournalClinical Microbiology and Infection
Volume31
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 08-2025

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Microbiology (medical)
  • Infectious Diseases

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Delayed correct diagnoses in emerging disease outbreaks: historical patterns and lessons for contemporary responses'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this