TY - JOUR
T1 - Efficacies of artificial neural networks ushering improvement in the prediction of extant credit risk models
AU - Aranha, Meera
AU - Bolar, Kartikeya
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank the editors and anonymous reviewers for their helpful suggestions. We also thank Venugopal K, Abhratanu Mondal, Palak Gupta, Soham Banerjee, and Tapoleena Paul, PGDM-BKFS students of T A Pai Management Institute, Manipal, for excellent research assistance. We have no conflict of interest to disclose. Any remaining errors are ours.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - The study’s objective is to check whether the predictive power of Machine Learning Techniques is better than Logistic Regression in predicting the bankruptcy of firms and that the same predictive power of ascertaining bankruptcy improves when a proxy for uncertainty is added to the model as a default driver. We considered the covid pandemic a black swan event that had caused ambiguity. A significant factor that has increased the probability of bankruptcy in recent times has been the large-scale supply chain disruptions and crippling lockdowns. Firms are trying to get back to pre-Covid utilization of plant capacity or pivot their business models differently to seize newer opportunities amidst the crisis. We considered the change in operating expenditure (primarily decrease) as our proxy for uncertainty as firms were forced to cut down majorly on their operations and thus incurred lesser variable costs. In an economy showing inflationary trends, the operating expenses will generally increase. But we found that the operational costs had shown a dip in the case of many of the firms during FY 20–21, and we attributed it to Covid disruptions. Results show that Machine Learning Techniques are better than Logistic Regression in predicting the bankruptcy of firms and that the same predictive power of ascertaining bankruptcy improves when a proxy for uncertainty is added to the model.
AB - The study’s objective is to check whether the predictive power of Machine Learning Techniques is better than Logistic Regression in predicting the bankruptcy of firms and that the same predictive power of ascertaining bankruptcy improves when a proxy for uncertainty is added to the model as a default driver. We considered the covid pandemic a black swan event that had caused ambiguity. A significant factor that has increased the probability of bankruptcy in recent times has been the large-scale supply chain disruptions and crippling lockdowns. Firms are trying to get back to pre-Covid utilization of plant capacity or pivot their business models differently to seize newer opportunities amidst the crisis. We considered the change in operating expenditure (primarily decrease) as our proxy for uncertainty as firms were forced to cut down majorly on their operations and thus incurred lesser variable costs. In an economy showing inflationary trends, the operating expenses will generally increase. But we found that the operational costs had shown a dip in the case of many of the firms during FY 20–21, and we attributed it to Covid disruptions. Results show that Machine Learning Techniques are better than Logistic Regression in predicting the bankruptcy of firms and that the same predictive power of ascertaining bankruptcy improves when a proxy for uncertainty is added to the model.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85159081319
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85159081319#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1080/23322039.2023.2210916
DO - 10.1080/23322039.2023.2210916
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85159081319
SN - 2332-2039
VL - 11
JO - Cogent Economics and Finance
JF - Cogent Economics and Finance
IS - 1
M1 - 2210916
ER -