TY - JOUR
T1 - Enhancement of knowledge and skills in laboratory techniques for autoantibody evaluation
T2 - Utility of a single-day hands-on workshop
AU - Misra, Durga
AU - Pani, Krushna
AU - Shenoy, Sajjan
AU - Wakhlu, Anupam
AU - Ghosh, Parasar
AU - Hissaria, Pravin
AU - Agarwal, Vikas
PY - 2018/9/1
Y1 - 2018/9/1
N2 - Background: Laboratory tests evaluating autoantibodies form a key part of rheumatology practice, yet this remains the least emphasized part of rheumatology training. Methods: We conducted a single-day autoantibody workshop to train young rheumatologists in the principles of autoantibody testing as well as provide hands-on exposure to conduct these tests. We assessed the efficacy of this workshop by pretest and posttest questionnaires evaluating three domains-Antigen-antibody interactions and laboratory techniques other than immunofluorescence (Domain 1); immunofluorescence (Domain 2); and clinical relevance of autoantibodies (Domain 3). In addition, we also sought unstructured feedback from participants. Results: There was a baseline knowledge deficit regarding autoantibody estimation and evaluation among the participants. Comparison of pre- A nd posttest questionnaires revealed that the 1-day workshop was effective in improving overall knowledge about autoantibody testing as well as in Domain 1 and 2 but not Domain 3. Hands-on exposure and basic level discussion of laboratory techniques were appreciated by attendees. Conclusion: A single-day workshop is effective in enhancing knowledge of attendees about autoantibody testing. In-depth discussions about these laboratory techniques in rheumatology, the immune mechanisms involved and association with clinical scenarios require workshops of longer duration.
AB - Background: Laboratory tests evaluating autoantibodies form a key part of rheumatology practice, yet this remains the least emphasized part of rheumatology training. Methods: We conducted a single-day autoantibody workshop to train young rheumatologists in the principles of autoantibody testing as well as provide hands-on exposure to conduct these tests. We assessed the efficacy of this workshop by pretest and posttest questionnaires evaluating three domains-Antigen-antibody interactions and laboratory techniques other than immunofluorescence (Domain 1); immunofluorescence (Domain 2); and clinical relevance of autoantibodies (Domain 3). In addition, we also sought unstructured feedback from participants. Results: There was a baseline knowledge deficit regarding autoantibody estimation and evaluation among the participants. Comparison of pre- A nd posttest questionnaires revealed that the 1-day workshop was effective in improving overall knowledge about autoantibody testing as well as in Domain 1 and 2 but not Domain 3. Hands-on exposure and basic level discussion of laboratory techniques were appreciated by attendees. Conclusion: A single-day workshop is effective in enhancing knowledge of attendees about autoantibody testing. In-depth discussions about these laboratory techniques in rheumatology, the immune mechanisms involved and association with clinical scenarios require workshops of longer duration.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85052684786&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85052684786&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.4103/injr.injr_153_17
DO - 10.4103/injr.injr_153_17
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85052684786
SN - 0973-3698
VL - 13
SP - 178
EP - 181
JO - Indian Journal of Rheumatology
JF - Indian Journal of Rheumatology
IS - 3
ER -