TY - JOUR
T1 - Erratum
T2 - “Preparation and characterization of chitosan–gelatin/ nanohydroxyapatite composite scaffolds for tissue engineering applications” [Carbohydrate Polymers, 80 (2010) 687–694] (Carbohydrate Polymers (2010) 80(3) (687–694), (S0144861709006912), (10.1016/j.carbpol.2009.11.050))
AU - Peter, Mathew
AU - Ganesh, Nitya
AU - Selvamurugan, N.
AU - Nair, S. V.
AU - Furuike, T.
AU - Tamura, H.
AU - Jayakumar, R.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2020/12/15
Y1 - 2020/12/15
N2 - In the original manuscript, the morphology of MG-63 cells that were grown after direct contact with the composite scaffolds figure (Fig. 6C) was provided incorrectly. The experiment was repeated and the corrected Figure 6 is provided below. [figure presented]> Fig. 6. (A) Protein adsorption on the scaffolds incubated with culture media for 1 h. Total protein adsorption was significantly high on composite scaffold. (∗p < 0.05), (B) the cell viability of CG/nHA composite scaffolds was assessed by direct MTT assay and (C) morphology of MG-63 cells which were grown after direct contact with the composite scaffolds. [figure presented] Further, in the cell attachment (MG-63) studies, higher magnification of image of the Chitosan-Gelatin scaffold (Fig. 7b) was provided incorrectly in the original manuscript. This mistakes is now rectified. The corrected Figure 7 is provided below. Fig. 7. SEM images showing MG-63 cells attached on the (a–c) CG and (d–f), CG/nHA composite scaffolds. Arrow shows the cells that have adhered to scaffolds. The changes in these figures would not affect the overall conclusion of this manuscript. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.
AB - In the original manuscript, the morphology of MG-63 cells that were grown after direct contact with the composite scaffolds figure (Fig. 6C) was provided incorrectly. The experiment was repeated and the corrected Figure 6 is provided below. [figure presented]> Fig. 6. (A) Protein adsorption on the scaffolds incubated with culture media for 1 h. Total protein adsorption was significantly high on composite scaffold. (∗p < 0.05), (B) the cell viability of CG/nHA composite scaffolds was assessed by direct MTT assay and (C) morphology of MG-63 cells which were grown after direct contact with the composite scaffolds. [figure presented] Further, in the cell attachment (MG-63) studies, higher magnification of image of the Chitosan-Gelatin scaffold (Fig. 7b) was provided incorrectly in the original manuscript. This mistakes is now rectified. The corrected Figure 7 is provided below. Fig. 7. SEM images showing MG-63 cells attached on the (a–c) CG and (d–f), CG/nHA composite scaffolds. Arrow shows the cells that have adhered to scaffolds. The changes in these figures would not affect the overall conclusion of this manuscript. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85089520353&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85089520353&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116899
DO - 10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116899
M3 - Comment/debate
AN - SCOPUS:85089520353
SN - 0144-8617
VL - 250
JO - Carbohydrate Polymers
JF - Carbohydrate Polymers
M1 - 116899
ER -