Abstract
In the original manuscript, the morphology of MG-63 cells that were grown after direct contact with the composite scaffolds figure (Fig. 6C) was provided incorrectly. The experiment was repeated and the corrected Figure 6 is provided below. [figure presented]> Fig. 6. (A) Protein adsorption on the scaffolds incubated with culture media for 1 h. Total protein adsorption was significantly high on composite scaffold. (∗p < 0.05), (B) the cell viability of CG/nHA composite scaffolds was assessed by direct MTT assay and (C) morphology of MG-63 cells which were grown after direct contact with the composite scaffolds. [figure presented] Further, in the cell attachment (MG-63) studies, higher magnification of image of the Chitosan-Gelatin scaffold (Fig. 7b) was provided incorrectly in the original manuscript. This mistakes is now rectified. The corrected Figure 7 is provided below. Fig. 7. SEM images showing MG-63 cells attached on the (a–c) CG and (d–f), CG/nHA composite scaffolds. Arrow shows the cells that have adhered to scaffolds. The changes in these figures would not affect the overall conclusion of this manuscript. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 116899 |
| Journal | Carbohydrate Polymers |
| Volume | 250 |
| DOIs |
|
| Publication status | Published - 15-12-2020 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Organic Chemistry
- Polymers and Plastics
- Materials Chemistry
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Erratum: “Preparation and characterization of chitosan–gelatin/ nanohydroxyapatite composite scaffolds for tissue engineering applications” [Carbohydrate Polymers, 80 (2010) 687–694] (Carbohydrate Polymers (2010) 80(3) (687–694), (S0144861709006912), (10.1016/j.carbpol.2009.11.050))'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver