Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Ethical evaluation of compulsory measles immunisation as a benchmark for good health management in the european union

  • Peter Schröder-Bäck*
  • , Helmut Brand
  • , Ixhel Escamilla
  • , John K. Davies
  • , Caroline Hall
  • , Kieran Hickey
  • , Eleni Jelastopulu
  • , Reli Mechtler
  • , Jaroslav Volf
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The results of the study Benchmarking Regional Health Management II suggest that compulsory measles immunisation is a good practice in public health management. Yet, the potential achievement of the desired health outcome alone is not a sufficient reason to make the immunisation obligatory. Rather, compulsory measles immunisation is a morally challenging measure.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)183-186
Number of pages4
JournalCentral European Journal of Public Health
Volume17
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01-12-2009

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Ethical evaluation of compulsory measles immunisation as a benchmark for good health management in the european union'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this