TY - GEN
T1 - Evaluating the Performance of ResNet-50 and GoogleNet for Damage Detection and Classification
AU - Baral, Anuj
AU - Singh, Vikash
AU - Lath, Achyut
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 IEEE.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Accurate and rapid assessment of structural damage is critical for maintaining the safety and integrity of infrastructure, especially following natural disasters. Traditional methods of damage assessment, which rely on manual inspections, can be labor-intensive and subject to human error. This study exam-ines the use of ResNet50 and GoogLeNet convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to automate the classification of damaged structures. The models were trained on a diverse dataset that includes images of both damaged and undamaged structures, ensuring their adaptability to different conditions. Evaluation metrics such as precision, recall, accuracy, and F1-score were used to measure performance. The results demonstrate that both ResNet50 and GoogLeNet are effective for assessing damage in post-disaster contexts. However, GoogLeNet shows a slight advantage achieving testing accuracy of 97.5% as compared to ResNet50 achieving 97.2% accuracy. This suggests that GoogLeNet offer a more reliable option for real-world disaster response applications.
AB - Accurate and rapid assessment of structural damage is critical for maintaining the safety and integrity of infrastructure, especially following natural disasters. Traditional methods of damage assessment, which rely on manual inspections, can be labor-intensive and subject to human error. This study exam-ines the use of ResNet50 and GoogLeNet convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to automate the classification of damaged structures. The models were trained on a diverse dataset that includes images of both damaged and undamaged structures, ensuring their adaptability to different conditions. Evaluation metrics such as precision, recall, accuracy, and F1-score were used to measure performance. The results demonstrate that both ResNet50 and GoogLeNet are effective for assessing damage in post-disaster contexts. However, GoogLeNet shows a slight advantage achieving testing accuracy of 97.5% as compared to ResNet50 achieving 97.2% accuracy. This suggests that GoogLeNet offer a more reliable option for real-world disaster response applications.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85214826455
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85214826455#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1109/ICSES63445.2024.10763274
DO - 10.1109/ICSES63445.2024.10763274
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85214826455
T3 - 4th International Conference on Sustainable Expert Systems, ICSES 2024 - Proceedings
SP - 1721
EP - 1726
BT - 4th International Conference on Sustainable Expert Systems, ICSES 2024 - Proceedings
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
T2 - 4th International Conference on Sustainable Expert Systems, ICSES 2024
Y2 - 15 October 2024 through 17 October 2024
ER -