Evaluation of placenta in foetal demise and foetal growth restriction

Ujwala Ch, Shyamala Guruvare, Sudha S. Bhat, Lavanya Rai, Sugandhi Rao

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)


Aim: The study objective was to evaluate the pathological changes of the placenta in foetal death and foetal growth restriction and to find correlation of the findings with clinical causes. Setting and Design: Prospective study at a tertiary care hospital. Material and Methods: Gross and histopathological examinations of the placentae were carried out in pregnancies with foetal demise (IUD) and Foetal Growth Restriction (FGR). Statistical analysis: SPSS, version 11.5. Results: Placentae of twenty seven women with foetal demise and of equal number of women with foetal growth restriction were studied. Placental weight was less than 10th percentile in 61.5% women in IUD group and in 93% women in the FGR group. Gross examination of placentae showed abnormalities in 12 (44%) women of IUD group and in 16 (59%) women of FGR group. Histopathological abnormalities were observed in 74.1% women of the IUD group and in 66.7% women of FGR group. Placental histopathology correlated with clinical risk factors in 60% women of IUD group and in 40% women of FGR group. Among the women with no clinically explainable cause for IUD and FGR, 86% and 57% had placental histopathological abnormalities respectively. Conclusion: The histopathological abnormalities of the placenta can be used to document the clinical causes of foetal demise and growth restriction; it may explain the causes in cases of clinically unexplained foetal demise and foetal growth restriction.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2530-2533
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Issue number11
Publication statusPublished - 10-11-2013

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Clinical Biochemistry


Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluation of placenta in foetal demise and foetal growth restriction'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this