Evaluation of the cytotoxic effect of the monoterpene indole alkaloid echitamine in-vitro and in tumour-bearing mice

G.C. Jagetia, M.S. Baliga, P. Venkatesh, J.N. Ulloor, S.K. Mantena, J. Genebriera, V. Mathuram

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

32 Citations (Scopus)


The cytotoxic effect of various concentrations of echitamine chloride was studied in HeLa, HepG2, HL60, KB and MCF-7 cell lines in-vitro and in mice bearing Ehrlich ascites carcinoma (EAQ. Exposure of various cells to different concentrations of echitamine chloride resulted in a concentration-dependent cell killing, and KB cells were found to be most sensitive amongst all the cells evaluated. EAC mice treated with 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 or 16 mg kg-1 echitamine chloride showed a dose-dependent elevation in the anti-tumour activity, as evident by increased number of survivors in comparison with the non-drug treated controls. The highest dose of echitamine chloride (16 mgkg-1) caused toxicity in the recipient mice, therefore 12 mgkg-1 was considered the best cytotoxic dose for its anti-tumour effect. Administration of 12 mgkg-1 echitamine chloride resulted in an increase in the median survival time (MST) up to 30.5 days, which was 11.5 days higher than the non-drug treated control (19 days). Administration of 16 mgkg-1 echitamine chloride to EAC mice resulted in a time dependent elevation in lipid peroxidation that reached a peak at 6 h post-treatment, whereas glutathione concentration declined in a time dependent manner and a maximum decline was reported at 3 h post-treatment. Our study demonstrated that echitamine chloride possessed anti-tumour activity in-vitro and in-vivo. © 2005 The Authors.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1213-1219
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology
Issue number9
Publication statusPublished - 2005
Externally publishedYes


Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluation of the cytotoxic effect of the monoterpene indole alkaloid echitamine in-vitro and in tumour-bearing mice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this