TY - JOUR
T1 - Evolution of LiverNet 2.x
T2 - Architectures for automated liver cancer grade classification from H&E stained liver histopathological images
AU - Chanchal, Amit Kumar
AU - Lal, Shyam
AU - Barnwal, Dipanshu
AU - Sinha, Prince
AU - Arvavasu, Shrikant
AU - Kini, Jyoti
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
PY - 2024/1
Y1 - 2024/1
N2 - Recently, the automation of disease identification has been quite popular in the field of medical diagnosis. The rise of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) for training and generalizing medical image data has proven to be quite efficient in detecting and identifying the types and sub-types of various diseases. Since the classification of large datasets of Hematoxylin & Eosin (H&E) stained histopathology images by experts can be expensive and time-consuming, automated processes using deep learning have been encouraged for the past decade. This paper introduces LiverNet 2.x model by modifying the previously encountered LiverNet architecture. The proposed model uses two different improvements of the Atrous Spatial Pyramid Pooling (ASPP) block to extract the clinically defined features of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) from liver histopathology images. LiverNet 2.0 uses a modified form of ASPP block known as DenseASPP, where all the atrous convolution outputs are densely connected. Whereas LiverNet 2.1 uses fewer concatenations while maintaining a large receptive field by stacking the dilated convolutional blocks in a tree-like fashion. This paper also discusses the trade-off between LiverNet 2.0 and LiverNet 2.1 in terms of accuracy and computational complexity. All comparison model and the proposed model is trained and tested on the patches of two different histopathological datasets. The experimental results show that the proposed model performs better compared to reference models. For the KMC Liver dataset, LiverNet 2.0 and LiverNet 2.1 achieved an accuracy of 97.50% and 97.14% respectively. Accuracy of 94.37% and 97.14% for the TCGA Liver dataset are achieved.
AB - Recently, the automation of disease identification has been quite popular in the field of medical diagnosis. The rise of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) for training and generalizing medical image data has proven to be quite efficient in detecting and identifying the types and sub-types of various diseases. Since the classification of large datasets of Hematoxylin & Eosin (H&E) stained histopathology images by experts can be expensive and time-consuming, automated processes using deep learning have been encouraged for the past decade. This paper introduces LiverNet 2.x model by modifying the previously encountered LiverNet architecture. The proposed model uses two different improvements of the Atrous Spatial Pyramid Pooling (ASPP) block to extract the clinically defined features of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) from liver histopathology images. LiverNet 2.0 uses a modified form of ASPP block known as DenseASPP, where all the atrous convolution outputs are densely connected. Whereas LiverNet 2.1 uses fewer concatenations while maintaining a large receptive field by stacking the dilated convolutional blocks in a tree-like fashion. This paper also discusses the trade-off between LiverNet 2.0 and LiverNet 2.1 in terms of accuracy and computational complexity. All comparison model and the proposed model is trained and tested on the patches of two different histopathological datasets. The experimental results show that the proposed model performs better compared to reference models. For the KMC Liver dataset, LiverNet 2.0 and LiverNet 2.1 achieved an accuracy of 97.50% and 97.14% respectively. Accuracy of 94.37% and 97.14% for the TCGA Liver dataset are achieved.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85159263591
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85159263591&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11042-023-15176-5
DO - 10.1007/s11042-023-15176-5
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85159263591
SN - 1380-7501
VL - 83
SP - 2791
EP - 2821
JO - Multimedia Tools and Applications
JF - Multimedia Tools and Applications
IS - 1
ER -