Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Financial Burden of General Surgeries by Insurance Status: A Single-Center Case Study from a Quaternary Care Teaching Hospital in Karnataka, India

  • Rajesh Kamath
  • , Reena Verma
  • , Naaz
  • , Rajib Mandal
  • , Tarushree Bari
  • , Varshini R. Jayapriya
  • , Ashok Kamat
  • , Sagarika Kamath
  • , Anindita Ghosh
  • , Nahima Akthar
  • , Ravichandran Nair*
  • , Manjunath Laxminarayana*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Surgical care is being increasingly recognized as a critical component of universal health coverage (UHC), with unmet surgical needs contributing substantially to morbidity, mortality, and financial hardship in low- and middle-income countries. In India, out-of-pocket expenditure (OOPE) remains the dominant mechanism for financing surgical care, raising concerns regarding financial risk protection. Publicly financed health insurance schemes such as the Ayushman Bharat Pradhan Mantri Jan Arogya Yojana (AB-PMJAY) have been introduced to reduce OOPE for inpatient services. Methods: A hospital-based single-center case study with a cross-sectional analytical design was conducted in a tertiary care teaching hospital in coastal Karnataka, India. A total of 150 patients undergoing common general surgical procedures (laparoscopic cholecystectomy, laparoscopic appendicectomy, inguinofemoral hernia repair, and umbilical hernia repair) were enrolled. Patients were categorized into three groups: uninsured, privately insured, and AB-PMJAY beneficiaries. Direct medical expenditure components were captured, and OOPE was compared across groups. Post hoc comparisons were performed following one-way ANOVA. Results: OOPE varied substantially across insurance categories. Uninsured patients incurred the highest mean OOPE, followed by privately insured patients, while AB-PMJAY beneficiaries reported negligible OOPE. Differences across groups were statistically significant (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Uninsured patients incurred a high financial burden for common surgical procedures, while private health insurance offered partial financial protection compared to no insurance. AB-PMJAY substantially reduced point-of-care expenditure for eligible beneficiaries. Expanding financial risk protection for surgical care may be essential for advancing equitable access and achieving UHC in India.

Original languageEnglish
Article number587
JournalHealthcare (Switzerland)
Volume14
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 03-2026

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Leadership and Management
  • Health Policy
  • Health Informatics
  • Health Information Management

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Financial Burden of General Surgeries by Insurance Status: A Single-Center Case Study from a Quaternary Care Teaching Hospital in Karnataka, India'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this