TY - JOUR
T1 - Homograft saphenous vein versus polytetrafluoroethylene graft for modified Blalock -Taussig shunt
AU - Bishnoi, Arvind Kumar
AU - Talwar, Sachin
AU - Choudhary, Shiv Kumar
AU - Hote, Milind
AU - Devagourou, Velayoudham
AU - Saxena, Anita
AU - Kothari, Shyam Sunder
AU - Juneja, Rajnish
AU - Airan, Balram
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2013 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2008
Y1 - 2008
N2 - Back ground: Modified Blalock-Taussig shunt is an important initial palliation in a selected subset of patients. This randomized controlled study was conducted to evaluate and compare PTFE and homograft saphenous vein as a conduit for this purpose. Patients and Methods: Thirty patients were prospectively randomized to receive either a Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) or an antibiotic preserved homograft saphenous vein as conduit. Early results were analysed and compared. Results: Mean graft size was 3.93 mm±0.53 and 4.2 mm±0.53 in the PTFE and vein group respectively. There were 3 hospital deaths in the vein group and none in the PTFE group. There were 2 early and no late shunt thromboses in PTFE group while 1 early and 2 late thrombosis occurred in vein group. These differences were statistically insignificant. The incidence of post-operative bleeding, peri-graft seroma and operative time was less in vein then PTFE group. Palliation on follow-up was comparable in both groups. Conclusion: This study failed to demonstrate any benefit of homograft saphenous vein over PTFE graft in terms of thrombotic complications and mortality. There was however less bleeding and peri-graft seroma formation in the Saphenous vein (SVG) group. Further studies with greater number of patients and longer follow-up are required to demonstrate the superiority of either of these conduits.
AB - Back ground: Modified Blalock-Taussig shunt is an important initial palliation in a selected subset of patients. This randomized controlled study was conducted to evaluate and compare PTFE and homograft saphenous vein as a conduit for this purpose. Patients and Methods: Thirty patients were prospectively randomized to receive either a Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) or an antibiotic preserved homograft saphenous vein as conduit. Early results were analysed and compared. Results: Mean graft size was 3.93 mm±0.53 and 4.2 mm±0.53 in the PTFE and vein group respectively. There were 3 hospital deaths in the vein group and none in the PTFE group. There were 2 early and no late shunt thromboses in PTFE group while 1 early and 2 late thrombosis occurred in vein group. These differences were statistically insignificant. The incidence of post-operative bleeding, peri-graft seroma and operative time was less in vein then PTFE group. Palliation on follow-up was comparable in both groups. Conclusion: This study failed to demonstrate any benefit of homograft saphenous vein over PTFE graft in terms of thrombotic complications and mortality. There was however less bleeding and peri-graft seroma formation in the Saphenous vein (SVG) group. Further studies with greater number of patients and longer follow-up are required to demonstrate the superiority of either of these conduits.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84873335535&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84873335535&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s12055-008-0051-z
DO - 10.1007/s12055-008-0051-z
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84873335535
SN - 0970-9134
VL - 24
SP - 227
EP - 232
JO - Indian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
JF - Indian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
IS - 4
ER -