TY - GEN
T1 - Identification of Myeloproliferative Neoplasms using Deep Learning
AU - Abraham, Soby
AU - Penchalareddy, Bhumireddy
AU - Sumam David, S.
AU - Vijayasenan, Deepu
AU - Sridevi, H. B.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 IEEE.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Myeloproliferative Neoplasms (MPNs) are a heterogeneous group of disorders characterized by proliferation of one or more hematologic cell. These myeloproliferative disorders have different morphological features associated with it. Microscopic studies and morphological evaluation becomes mandatory in all these cases to reach a proper diagnosis. In this paper, we are trying to exploit the morphological features using deep learning techniques to narrow down the region of interest of MPNs. Here semantic segmentation is performed and the various types of MPNs (Benign, ET, MF, PV and CML) are classified. To perform this task, we have used MobileUNet and ResUNet++ deep learning network architectures and the performance is evaluated using F-scores and accuracy of the corresponding classes. The two models were compared and MobileUNet model is giving a better performance with an average F-score of 62% and ResUNet++ is having an average F-score of 59%.
AB - Myeloproliferative Neoplasms (MPNs) are a heterogeneous group of disorders characterized by proliferation of one or more hematologic cell. These myeloproliferative disorders have different morphological features associated with it. Microscopic studies and morphological evaluation becomes mandatory in all these cases to reach a proper diagnosis. In this paper, we are trying to exploit the morphological features using deep learning techniques to narrow down the region of interest of MPNs. Here semantic segmentation is performed and the various types of MPNs (Benign, ET, MF, PV and CML) are classified. To perform this task, we have used MobileUNet and ResUNet++ deep learning network architectures and the performance is evaluated using F-scores and accuracy of the corresponding classes. The two models were compared and MobileUNet model is giving a better performance with an average F-score of 62% and ResUNet++ is having an average F-score of 59%.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85198668487
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85198668487#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1109/WiDS-PSU61003.2024.00027
DO - 10.1109/WiDS-PSU61003.2024.00027
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85198668487
T3 - Proceedings - 2024 7th International Women in Data Science Conference at Prince Sultan University, WiDS-PSU 2024
SP - 62
EP - 66
BT - Proceedings - 2024 7th International Women in Data Science Conference at Prince Sultan University, WiDS-PSU 2024
A2 - Rehm, Amjad
A2 - Azar, Ahmad Taher
A2 - Saba, Tanzila
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
T2 - 7th International Women in Data Science Conference at Prince Sultan University, WiDS-PSU 2024
Y2 - 3 March 2024 through 4 March 2024
ER -