TY - JOUR
T1 - Implementation of Article 5.3 of the World Health Organization Framework Convention on Tobacco Control
T2 - A Subnational Assessment
AU - Kumar, Praveen
AU - Kamath, Veena
AU - Kamath, Asha
AU - Bhojani, Upendra
AU - Chugh, Aastha
AU - Bassi, Shalini
AU - Kulkarni, Muralidhar M.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) with funding from the Global Challenges Research Fund (GCRF). The activities and results presented in this publication were undertaken as part of the Tobacco Control Capacity Programme (MR/P027946/1). Upendra Bhojani is not part of TCCP and UKRI/GCRF support. He is a co‑supervisor to the doctoral study of Praveen Kumar (first author). He was supported for his time through the DBT/Wellcome trust India Alliance fellowships (IA/ CPHI/17/1/503346) awarded to him.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Indian Journal of Community Medicine.
PY - 2022/10
Y1 - 2022/10
N2 - Background: Article 5.3 of the World Health Organization’s Framework Convention on Tobacco Control necessitates the governments to take measures to protect health policy from the commercial and other vested interests of the tobacco industry (TI). Considering the vast geographical area and diversity between states within India, it is necessary to evaluate the level of implementation of Article 5.3 at the sub‑national level. Hence, this study was conducted to assess the implementation of Article 5.3 in the Karnataka state of southern India. Materials and Method: Southeast Asia Tobacco Control Alliance Tobacco Industry Interference index was adopted and used for the study. A desk review was conducted for 2018. Publicly available evidence of tobacco industry interference was scored based on its frequency, severity, and the government’s response to it. Lower the score, effective the level of governance against the TI interference, which predicts well for the state. Results: The study demonstrates a score of 46 out of 95 in the implementation of Article 5.3 in Karnataka, which is lower when compared to the national score of 69 out of 100 for 2018. Corporate social responsibility, conflict of interest, and unnecessary interactions with TI are the major areas that need focus to comply with the provisions of Article 5.3. Conclusion: Overall, Karnataka needs to strengthen the implementation of Article 5.3 and develop a strategy in line with the global best practices. This assessment can help in identifying areas requiring enhanced vigilance to avoid industry interference.
AB - Background: Article 5.3 of the World Health Organization’s Framework Convention on Tobacco Control necessitates the governments to take measures to protect health policy from the commercial and other vested interests of the tobacco industry (TI). Considering the vast geographical area and diversity between states within India, it is necessary to evaluate the level of implementation of Article 5.3 at the sub‑national level. Hence, this study was conducted to assess the implementation of Article 5.3 in the Karnataka state of southern India. Materials and Method: Southeast Asia Tobacco Control Alliance Tobacco Industry Interference index was adopted and used for the study. A desk review was conducted for 2018. Publicly available evidence of tobacco industry interference was scored based on its frequency, severity, and the government’s response to it. Lower the score, effective the level of governance against the TI interference, which predicts well for the state. Results: The study demonstrates a score of 46 out of 95 in the implementation of Article 5.3 in Karnataka, which is lower when compared to the national score of 69 out of 100 for 2018. Corporate social responsibility, conflict of interest, and unnecessary interactions with TI are the major areas that need focus to comply with the provisions of Article 5.3. Conclusion: Overall, Karnataka needs to strengthen the implementation of Article 5.3 and develop a strategy in line with the global best practices. This assessment can help in identifying areas requiring enhanced vigilance to avoid industry interference.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85148368160&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85148368160&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.4103/ijcm.ijcm_1491_21
DO - 10.4103/ijcm.ijcm_1491_21
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85148368160
SN - 0970-0218
VL - 47
SP - 531
EP - 535
JO - Indian Journal of Community Medicine
JF - Indian Journal of Community Medicine
IS - 4
ER -