TY - JOUR
T1 - In-vivo Comparison of Planned and Measured Rectal Doses during Cobalt-60 HDR CT-based Intracavitary Brachytherapy Applications of Cervical Cancer Using the PTW 9112 Semiconductor Probe
AU - Johan, Sunny K.
AU - Lobo, Dilson
AU - Athiyamaan, M. S.
AU - Srinivas, Challapalli
AU - Banerjee, Sourjya
AU - Abhishek, Krishna
AU - Saxena, P. U.Prakash
N1 - Funding Information:
Authors would like to express sincere thanks to Ms Pooja, trainee dosimetrist and Mr. Anish undergraduate student of RTT for their active involvement and participation this study
Publisher Copyright:
© This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International License
PY - 2023/3/1
Y1 - 2023/3/1
N2 - Background: A semiconductor rectal probe was used to compare planned and measured rectal doses during Co-60 high dose rate (HDR) CT-based intracavitary brachytherapy applications (ICBT) of cervical cancer. Materials and Methods: A total of 22 HDR brachytherapy applications were included from 11 patients who were first treated with EBRT to the whole pelvis with a total prescribed dose of 50 Gy in 25 fractions. During each application, a PTW 9112 probe rectal probe having a series of five semiconductor diodes (R1 to R5) was inserted into the patient’s rectum and a CT-based HDR ICBT application with a prescribed dose per fraction of 7 or 7.5 Gy to HRCTV was performed. Measurements were carried in water phantom using PTW rectal and universal adaptor plugs. Doses measured in phantom and with patients were compared to those calculated by the treatment planning system. Results: The mean percentage dose difference ΔD (%) between calculated and measured values from phantom study were -5.29%, 1.89%, -2.72%, -4.76, and 0.72% for R1, R2, R3, R4, and R3 diodes, respectively and the overall mean ΔD (%) value with standard deviation (SD) was -2.03%±9.6%. From the patient study, a ΔD (%) that ranged from -19.5% to 24.0%, which corresponded to dose disparities between -0.77 Gy and 0.66 Gy. The median ΔD (%) ranged from 0.4% to 1.3%, or -0.03 to 0.05 Gy, respectively. ΔD (%) values exceeded 10% in approximately 26.4% of measurements (29 out of 110 in 22 applications). The location of R max in computed and measured values differs in 5 of 22 applications might be due to possible displacement of rectal probe between simulation and treatment.
AB - Background: A semiconductor rectal probe was used to compare planned and measured rectal doses during Co-60 high dose rate (HDR) CT-based intracavitary brachytherapy applications (ICBT) of cervical cancer. Materials and Methods: A total of 22 HDR brachytherapy applications were included from 11 patients who were first treated with EBRT to the whole pelvis with a total prescribed dose of 50 Gy in 25 fractions. During each application, a PTW 9112 probe rectal probe having a series of five semiconductor diodes (R1 to R5) was inserted into the patient’s rectum and a CT-based HDR ICBT application with a prescribed dose per fraction of 7 or 7.5 Gy to HRCTV was performed. Measurements were carried in water phantom using PTW rectal and universal adaptor plugs. Doses measured in phantom and with patients were compared to those calculated by the treatment planning system. Results: The mean percentage dose difference ΔD (%) between calculated and measured values from phantom study were -5.29%, 1.89%, -2.72%, -4.76, and 0.72% for R1, R2, R3, R4, and R3 diodes, respectively and the overall mean ΔD (%) value with standard deviation (SD) was -2.03%±9.6%. From the patient study, a ΔD (%) that ranged from -19.5% to 24.0%, which corresponded to dose disparities between -0.77 Gy and 0.66 Gy. The median ΔD (%) ranged from 0.4% to 1.3%, or -0.03 to 0.05 Gy, respectively. ΔD (%) values exceeded 10% in approximately 26.4% of measurements (29 out of 110 in 22 applications). The location of R max in computed and measured values differs in 5 of 22 applications might be due to possible displacement of rectal probe between simulation and treatment.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85150991358&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85150991358&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.31557/APJCP.2023.24.3.897
DO - 10.31557/APJCP.2023.24.3.897
M3 - Article
C2 - 36974543
AN - SCOPUS:85150991358
SN - 1513-7368
VL - 24
SP - 897
EP - 907
JO - Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
JF - Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
IS - 3
ER -