Indigenously developed ultrasound phantom model versus a commercially available training model: Randomized double-blinded study to assess its utility to teach ultrasound guided vascular access in a controlled setting

Siju Abraham, Ronald Melit, S. Krishnan, Tijo George, Meenhas Kunhahamed, C. Kassyap, Sanjeev Bhoi, Tej Sinha

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The commercially available training phantoms being expensive, homemade models are popular surrogates for training. We intended to study how comparable our indigenously developed ultrasound phantom (IDUP) was with the commercially available model for ultrasound-guided vascular access (USGVA) training. We also assessed the change in confidence among trainees using a 21-h standardized program. Methods: A prospective randomized double-blinded, parallel design study, with sequential allocation, was done after a standardized point of care ultrasound training course. Over three consecutive courses, 48 trainees volunteered to take part in the study. The models (IDUP and commercial phantom) were allocated as model A and model B. In each course, participants were also allotted sequentially to either perform in-plane or out of plane approach first, at the testing stations. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare pretest with posttest scores. Results: There was a statistically significant difference between IDUP and commercial phantom with respect to the resemblance to human tissue on tactile feedback and ease to perform the procedure. However, both models did not show a statistically significant difference in terms of ease of use, visual resemblance to human tissue, needle visualization, and artifacts on ultrasonography display. A significant change in the confidence levels of participants was seen postcourse. Conclusion: IDUP was a comparable alternative to the commercial model for USGVA training in a resource-limited setting. A 21-h standardized training program improved the trainee's confidence in performing and teaching USGVA.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)11-19
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Medical Ultrasound
Volume30
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01-01-2022

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Indigenously developed ultrasound phantom model versus a commercially available training model: Randomized double-blinded study to assess its utility to teach ultrasound guided vascular access in a controlled setting'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this