TY - JOUR
T1 - Influential factors affecting perceptions of interprofessional collaboration for advancing health outcomes
T2 - Insights and recommendations from an international fellowship program
AU - Ali Mohammed, Ciraj
AU - Chaturvedi, Abhishek
AU - Kamath, M. Ganesh
AU - Ummer, Saleena Velladath
AU - Bajaj, Gagan
N1 - Funding Information:
MAHE-FAIMER Institute offers a two-year fellowship program offered by the Manipal Academy of Higher Education (MAHE) and Foundation for Advancement of International Medical Education and Research (FAIMER), Philadelphia, which emphasizes the development of leadership competencies for promoting interprofessional education and practice equipping healthcare professionals with the necessary skills and knowledge for IPE and IPCP. The leadership component introduces the tenets of strength-based and positive leadership principles essential for leading IPE teams. Since project-based learning is a crucial component of this fellowship, fellows are introduced to project management, including elements of managerial leadership involving shared decision-making, conflict resolution, delegation, and negotiation. As a mandatory requirement, the enrolled fellows need to undertake projects focusing on IPE or IPCP. 20–22 Since its establishment, the MAHE-FAIMER institute has attracted fellows from various locations within the Indian subcontinent and neighboring regions in South Asia. This geographical diversity is further enriched by the presence of fellows from diverse health professional backgrounds, creating a learning environment that is highly pertinent and favorable for fostering IPE and IPCP.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Author(s)
PY - 2023/11/1
Y1 - 2023/11/1
N2 - Objectives: This study aims to examine the perception of health professions faculty towards interprofessional collaboration and to analyze how these perceptions are linked with their profession and prior professional experiences. Methods: This study includes a convenience sample of 90 professionals who enrolled in a fellowship programme that focused on leadership competencies in interprofessional education. The perception of the Interprofessional Collaboration Model Questionnaire (PINCOM-Q) was used for data collection. The Chi-square test for independence was used to explore the relationship between profession and perception. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare between the groups. Results: The response rate was 90%, with the majority of the participants being women (n = 49, 54.4%). The mean age was 42.16 ± 5.88 years (Range = 31–55 years). The most prominent constructs of collaboration perceived by the participants were: motivation, group leadership, and organisational culture. A difference in the perception based on age, years of experience, prior experience of working in interprofessional teams, and profession was observed. The Pearson correlation between construct averages was statistically significant (p ≤ 0.001) between: individuals and groups, r = 0.493; individuals and organisation, r = 0.418; and group and organisation, r = 0.683. Conclusion: The present study revealed that the perception of health professions faculty towards interprofessional collaboration differs in relation to their gender, age, professional qualification, working experience, professional background, and past experience with the interprofessional team. The study highlights the need to consider these factors while working with interprofessional teams.
AB - Objectives: This study aims to examine the perception of health professions faculty towards interprofessional collaboration and to analyze how these perceptions are linked with their profession and prior professional experiences. Methods: This study includes a convenience sample of 90 professionals who enrolled in a fellowship programme that focused on leadership competencies in interprofessional education. The perception of the Interprofessional Collaboration Model Questionnaire (PINCOM-Q) was used for data collection. The Chi-square test for independence was used to explore the relationship between profession and perception. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare between the groups. Results: The response rate was 90%, with the majority of the participants being women (n = 49, 54.4%). The mean age was 42.16 ± 5.88 years (Range = 31–55 years). The most prominent constructs of collaboration perceived by the participants were: motivation, group leadership, and organisational culture. A difference in the perception based on age, years of experience, prior experience of working in interprofessional teams, and profession was observed. The Pearson correlation between construct averages was statistically significant (p ≤ 0.001) between: individuals and groups, r = 0.493; individuals and organisation, r = 0.418; and group and organisation, r = 0.683. Conclusion: The present study revealed that the perception of health professions faculty towards interprofessional collaboration differs in relation to their gender, age, professional qualification, working experience, professional background, and past experience with the interprofessional team. The study highlights the need to consider these factors while working with interprofessional teams.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85172389939
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85172389939#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1016/j.cegh.2023.101411
DO - 10.1016/j.cegh.2023.101411
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85172389939
SN - 2213-3984
VL - 24
JO - Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health
JF - Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health
M1 - 101411
ER -