TY - JOUR
T1 - Insight into the Evolution of Anuran Foot Flag Displays
T2 - A Comparative Study of Color and Kinematics
AU - Anderson, Nigel K.
AU - Gururaja, K. V.
AU - Mangiamele, Lisa A.
AU - Netoskie, Erin C.
AU - Smith, Sarah
AU - Fuxjager, Matthew J.
AU - Preininger, Doris
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by National Science Foundation grants IOS-1947472 (to M.J.F.), OISE-1952542 (to M.J.F.), and IOS-1655574 (to L.A.M.), and U.S. Student Fulbright Fellowship (to E.C.N.), as well as the Vienna Zoo (to D.P.). Permission to work in India was granted by the National Biodiversity Authority (NBA/TechAppl/9/998/15/17–18/346) and the Karnataka State Forest Department, Government of Karnataka (PCCF/WL/E2/CR/20/2017-18). We thank M. C. Miles for early discussions about kinematic analyses. We also thank Sharmila Gowri Shankar, P Gowri Shankar, and P Prashanth of Kãlinga Center for Rainforest Ecology for their help with data collection and logistical support in the field. We thank the team of the Rainforest House of the Vienna Zoo and curator Anton Weissenbacher for their support with data collection. We also thank the Elizabeth Horner and Nancy Kershaw Tomlinson Memorial Funds. Special thanks to Walter Hödl for initiating foot flagging research and his continuous long-term support.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 by the American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists
PY - 2021/12/1
Y1 - 2021/12/1
N2 - Understanding how complex animal displays evolve is a major goal of evolutionary organismal biology. Here, we study this topic by comparing convergently evolved gestural displays in two unrelated species of frog (Bornean Rock Frog, Staurois parvus, and Kottigehara Dancing Frog, Micrixalus kottigeharensis). This behavior, known as a foot flag, is produced when a male ?waves' his hindlimb at another male during bouts of competition for access to mates. We assess patterns of variation in the color of frog feet and the kinematics of the display itself to help pinpoint similarities and differences of the visual signal elements. We find clear species differences in the color of foot webbing, which is broadcast to receivers during specific phases of the display. Analyses of foot-trajectory duration and geometry also reveal clear species differences in display speed and shape - S. parvus generates a faster and more circular visual signal, while M. kottigeharensis generates a much slower and more elliptical one. These data are consistent with the notion that color, speed, and shape likely encode species identity. However, we also found that foot flag speed shows significant among-individual variation, particularly the phase of the display in which foot webbings are visible. This result is consistent with the idea that frogs alter temporal signal components, which may showcase individual condition, quality, or motivation. Overall, our comparative study helps elucidate the variability of foot flagging behavior in a manner that informs how we understand the design principles that underlie its function as a signal in intraspecific communication.
AB - Understanding how complex animal displays evolve is a major goal of evolutionary organismal biology. Here, we study this topic by comparing convergently evolved gestural displays in two unrelated species of frog (Bornean Rock Frog, Staurois parvus, and Kottigehara Dancing Frog, Micrixalus kottigeharensis). This behavior, known as a foot flag, is produced when a male ?waves' his hindlimb at another male during bouts of competition for access to mates. We assess patterns of variation in the color of frog feet and the kinematics of the display itself to help pinpoint similarities and differences of the visual signal elements. We find clear species differences in the color of foot webbing, which is broadcast to receivers during specific phases of the display. Analyses of foot-trajectory duration and geometry also reveal clear species differences in display speed and shape - S. parvus generates a faster and more circular visual signal, while M. kottigeharensis generates a much slower and more elliptical one. These data are consistent with the notion that color, speed, and shape likely encode species identity. However, we also found that foot flag speed shows significant among-individual variation, particularly the phase of the display in which foot webbings are visible. This result is consistent with the idea that frogs alter temporal signal components, which may showcase individual condition, quality, or motivation. Overall, our comparative study helps elucidate the variability of foot flagging behavior in a manner that informs how we understand the design principles that underlie its function as a signal in intraspecific communication.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85122353998&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85122353998&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1643/h2020160
DO - 10.1643/h2020160
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85122353998
SN - 2766-1512
VL - 109
SP - 1047
EP - 1059
JO - Ichthyology and Herpetology
JF - Ichthyology and Herpetology
IS - 4
ER -