Intelligent GD&T symbol detection in mechanical drawings: a comparative study of YOLOv11, Faster R-CNN, and RetinaNet for quality assurance

  • Tadigotla Narendra Reddy
  • , Nitesh Kumar*
  • , Nachappa Pemmanda Ponnappa
  • , Nagasiri Mohana
  • , Prakash Vinod
  • , Mervin A. Herbert
  • , Shrikantha S. Rao
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Geometric dimensioning and tolerancing (GD&T) symbols play a vital role in engineering drawings by specifying allowable variations in part geometry to ensure manufacturing precision and functional performance. Manual identification and extraction of these symbols is labour-intensive, prone to human error, and increasingly unsuitable for fast-paced production environments, as it significantly increases quality inspection time and indirectly delays overall product delivery. This research is specifically conducted to support the development of intelligent quality management systems by integrating machine learning algorithms capable of detecting GD&T symbols directly from CAD-generated mechanical drawings. Such capability is essential for automating inspection processes and enabling reliable data extraction from design files, which are foundational to digital manufacturing workflows. Additionally, with many commercial quality automation tools being prohibitively expensive for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and micro, small, and medium enterprises (MSMEs), there is a pressing need for cost-effective, indigenous solutions. This study addresses that gap by evaluating three state-of-the-art deep learning-based object detection models—YOLOv11, Faster R-CNN, and RetinaNet—for GD&T symbol recognition. Each model was trained on a custom dataset annotated with diverse GD&T symbols, and performance was assessed using standard evaluation metrics: accuracy, recall, F1 score, and inference speed. The results show that while all three models demonstrate robust performance, YOLOv11 strikes the best balance between detection accuracy and real-time execution. This comparative study not only guides R&D teams in selecting the most suitable model for quality automation tasks but also contributes to the broader goal of enabling affordable, scalable, and intelligent visual inspection systems for SMEs and MSMEs.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Intelligent Manufacturing
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 2025

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Software
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
  • Artificial Intelligence

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Intelligent GD&T symbol detection in mechanical drawings: a comparative study of YOLOv11, Faster R-CNN, and RetinaNet for quality assurance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this