TY - JOUR
T1 - Is gingival biotype a critical determinant of secondary stability of orthodontic mini-implants – a prospective clinical study using resonance frequency analysis
AU - Pradhan, Sayali Prashant
AU - Nambiar, Supriya
AU - Shetty, Shravan
AU - Shetty, Siddarth
AU - Jose, Nidhin Philip
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
©2019 Published by Scientific Scholar on behalf of APOS Trends in Orthodontics.
PY - 2020/10/1
Y1 - 2020/10/1
N2 - Objectives: The objectives of the study were to determine the association of gingival biotype and secondary stability of orthodontic mini-implants using resonance frequency analysis. Materials and Methods: Twenty patients, each receiving two mini-implants, were divided into two groups; thick and thin gingival biotype based on the thickness of gingiva before mini-implant placement. Implant stability was assessed at the time of placement; at the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th month by resonance frequency analysis. Peri-implant soft-tissue conditions were also examined at each month till 4 months interval using periodontal indices. Results: Thick and thin gingival biotype groups showed statistically different implant stability quotient (ISQ). Mini-implants showing signs of failure consistently displayed lesser ISQ. Statistically significant difference was observed in the scores of peri-implant indices of failure and no failure group of mini-implants. Conclusion: Mini-implants in thin gingival biotype are more susceptible to failure and peri-implantitis compared to thick gingival biotype. Longitudinal assessment of mini-implant stability may help predict failure so as to avoid long duration and cost of orthodontic treatment.
AB - Objectives: The objectives of the study were to determine the association of gingival biotype and secondary stability of orthodontic mini-implants using resonance frequency analysis. Materials and Methods: Twenty patients, each receiving two mini-implants, were divided into two groups; thick and thin gingival biotype based on the thickness of gingiva before mini-implant placement. Implant stability was assessed at the time of placement; at the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th month by resonance frequency analysis. Peri-implant soft-tissue conditions were also examined at each month till 4 months interval using periodontal indices. Results: Thick and thin gingival biotype groups showed statistically different implant stability quotient (ISQ). Mini-implants showing signs of failure consistently displayed lesser ISQ. Statistically significant difference was observed in the scores of peri-implant indices of failure and no failure group of mini-implants. Conclusion: Mini-implants in thin gingival biotype are more susceptible to failure and peri-implantitis compared to thick gingival biotype. Longitudinal assessment of mini-implant stability may help predict failure so as to avoid long duration and cost of orthodontic treatment.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85118770895&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85118770895&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.25259/APOS_105_2020
DO - 10.25259/APOS_105_2020
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85118770895
SN - 2321-4600
VL - 10
SP - 245
EP - 252
JO - APOS Trends in Orthodontics
JF - APOS Trends in Orthodontics
IS - 4
ER -