Is 'rapid response' a future alternative to 'letter to the editor'?

Ritesh G. Menezes^*
, Tanuj Kanchan
, Stany W. Lobo
, Aman Chauhan

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Letter › peer-review

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	444
Number of pages	1
Journal	Current Science
Volume	96
Issue number	4
Publication status	Published - 01-02-2009
Externally published	Yes

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

General

Other files and links

Cite this

@article{bd893a5f3f264602b266a3fb7c90feb5,

title = "Is 'rapid response' a future alternative to 'letter to the editor'?",

author = "Menezes, \{Ritesh G.\} and Tanuj Kanchan and Lobo, \{Stany W.\} and Aman Chauhan",

year = "2009",

month = feb,

day = "1",

language = "English",

volume = "96",

pages = "444",

journal = "Current Science",

issn = "0011-3891",

publisher = "Indian Academy of Sciences",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is 'rapid response' a future alternative to 'letter to the editor'?

AU - Menezes, Ritesh G.

AU - Kanchan, Tanuj

AU - Lobo, Stany W.

AU - Chauhan, Aman

PY - 2009/2/1

Y1 - 2009/2/1

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/67650317450

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/67650317450#tab=citedBy

M3 - Letter

AN - SCOPUS:67650317450

SN - 0011-3891

VL - 96

SP - 444

JO - Current Science

JF - Current Science

IS - 4

ER -