Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Machine Learning-Based Optimization for Enhanced Pullulan Recovery from Aureobasidium pullulans

  • Nageswar Sahu
  • , Biswanath Mahanty*
  • , Dibyajyoti Haldar*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    The solvent extraction protocol significantly influences the yield and purity of the exopolysaccharide recovery from cell-free broth. In this study, methanol, ethanol, isopropanol, acetone, and PEG-6000 were compared for the amount of pullulan recovery (PR), sucrose equivalent (SE), and protein impurity (PI) of the precipitate. The PR (7.0 g L-1) and SE (0.45 g g-1) from acetone had been significantly better than others. Quadratic and GA-optimized artificial neural network (ANN) models, developed from a central composite design, accurately predicted PR (R2: 0.996-0.998), SE (R2: 0.961-0.985), and PI (R2: 0.952-0.984) based on the pH, incubation time, and solvent-to-broth volume (S/B) ratio. Individually optimized PR (10.53 g L-1), SE (0.64 g g-1), and PI (1.05 mg g-1) from quadratic models are comparable to those obtained from ANN models. Multiobjective optimization with equal weighting suggests a moderate PR (quadratic model: 8.14 g L-1, ANN: 6.77 g L-1) while maintaining SE and PI close to their optimal values. However, the relative importance of these objectives should be ascertained based on the intended application.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)18575-18585
    Number of pages11
    JournalIndustrial and Engineering Chemistry Research
    Volume63
    Issue number43
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 30-10-2024

    All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

    • General Chemistry
    • General Chemical Engineering
    • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Machine Learning-Based Optimization for Enhanced Pullulan Recovery from Aureobasidium pullulans'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this