TY - GEN
T1 - Minimization of Churn Rate Through Analysis of Machine Learning
AU - Soundarya, B. C.
AU - Gururaj, H. L.
AU - Chaithra, K. N.
AU - Manu, M. N.
AU - Shrikanth, N. G.
AU - Anupama, K.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 IEEE.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Attrition of customers is another name for customer churn. Today, there are an increasing number of clients who leave each year - nearly 1.5 million on average. The banking sector confronts difficulties keeping customers. Due to shifting factors, such as better financial services at cheaper costs, bank branch location, low interest rates, etc., customers may decide to switch banks. As a result, prediction models are used to identify clients who are likely to leave in the future. Because maintaining long-term relationships with consumers is less expensive than losing a customer, which causes a loss of profit for the bank. Older consumers also generate greater rewards and offer fresh references. In this paper, different models of machine learning such as Logistic regression (LR), decision tree (DT), K-nearest neighbor (KNN), random forest (RF), etc. are used and also the comparison in terms of performance like accuracy, recall, etc. is presented. Among these classifiers Random Forest has achieved best accuracy of 71%.
AB - Attrition of customers is another name for customer churn. Today, there are an increasing number of clients who leave each year - nearly 1.5 million on average. The banking sector confronts difficulties keeping customers. Due to shifting factors, such as better financial services at cheaper costs, bank branch location, low interest rates, etc., customers may decide to switch banks. As a result, prediction models are used to identify clients who are likely to leave in the future. Because maintaining long-term relationships with consumers is less expensive than losing a customer, which causes a loss of profit for the bank. Older consumers also generate greater rewards and offer fresh references. In this paper, different models of machine learning such as Logistic regression (LR), decision tree (DT), K-nearest neighbor (KNN), random forest (RF), etc. are used and also the comparison in terms of performance like accuracy, recall, etc. is presented. Among these classifiers Random Forest has achieved best accuracy of 71%.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85164265318&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85164265318&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/ICDCECE57866.2023.10150441
DO - 10.1109/ICDCECE57866.2023.10150441
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85164265318
T3 - 2nd IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing and Electrical Circuits and Electronics, ICDCECE 2023
BT - 2nd IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing and Electrical Circuits and Electronics, ICDCECE 2023
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
T2 - 2nd IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing and Electrical Circuits and Electronics, ICDCECE 2023
Y2 - 29 April 2023 through 30 April 2023
ER -