TY - JOUR
T1 - Modified Precordial Lead R-Wave Deflection Interval Predicts Left- and Right-Sided Idiopathic Outflow Tract Ventricular Arrhythmias
AU - Anderson, Robert D.
AU - Kumar, Saurabh
AU - Binny, Simon
AU - Prabhu, Mukund
AU - Al-Kaisey, Ahmed
AU - Parameswaran, Ramanathan
AU - Sugumar, Hariharan
AU - Chieng, David
AU - Hawson, Joshua
AU - Campbell, Timothy
AU - Joshi, Subodh
AU - Lui, Elaine
AU - Sparks, Paul B.
AU - Joseph, Stephen A.
AU - Morton, Joseph B.
AU - McLellan, Alex
AU - Lipton, Jonathan
AU - Pathik, Bhupesh
AU - Kistler, Peter M.
AU - Kalman, Jonathan
AU - Lee, Geoffrey
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 American College of Cardiology Foundation
PY - 2020/10/26
Y1 - 2020/10/26
N2 - Objectives: This study evaluated if modifying electrocardiographic (ECG) precordial leads to a higher intercostal position improved the accuracy of outflow tract ventricular arrhythmia (OTVA) localization. Background: Precordial ECG prediction algorithms that use a standard lead configuration localize OTVA with variable accuracy. Methods: Patients who underwent OTVA ablation were prospectively enrolled to have a standard and modified (high) precordial ECG. R- and S-wave amplitudes and intervals were measured to develop an algorithm that differentiated the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) and the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) with high accuracy—the modified lead R-wave deflection interval (RWDI). This interval was defined from the earliest QRS onset (using all modified leads) to the lead with longest R-wave deflection. The RWDI was compared with all other ECG algorithms. Results: A total of 50 patients (38 women; mean age 51 ± 17 years) had successful catheter ablation for OTVA (RVOT 60%, LVOT 40%). The modified lead RWDI was significantly shorter in the RVOT group (18.5 ms, interquartile range 25th to 75th percentile [IQR25−75]: 0 to 29.5 ms) compared with the LVOT group (67.5 ms, IQR25−75: 56.5 to 77 ms; p < 0.05). Using a RWDI ≤40 ms to predict an RVOT focus, the sensitivity and specificity of the modified lead RWDI were 100% and 95%, respectively; the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve was 0.96. This was superior to all previously developed algorithms. In a computed tomography analysis (n = 50), the modified leads were significantly closer to the outflow tracts compared with the standard precordial leads. Conclusions: The modified lead RWDI is a simple, easily interpretable algorithm that can potentially differentiate a right- or left-sided origin of OTVA with high accuracy.
AB - Objectives: This study evaluated if modifying electrocardiographic (ECG) precordial leads to a higher intercostal position improved the accuracy of outflow tract ventricular arrhythmia (OTVA) localization. Background: Precordial ECG prediction algorithms that use a standard lead configuration localize OTVA with variable accuracy. Methods: Patients who underwent OTVA ablation were prospectively enrolled to have a standard and modified (high) precordial ECG. R- and S-wave amplitudes and intervals were measured to develop an algorithm that differentiated the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) and the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) with high accuracy—the modified lead R-wave deflection interval (RWDI). This interval was defined from the earliest QRS onset (using all modified leads) to the lead with longest R-wave deflection. The RWDI was compared with all other ECG algorithms. Results: A total of 50 patients (38 women; mean age 51 ± 17 years) had successful catheter ablation for OTVA (RVOT 60%, LVOT 40%). The modified lead RWDI was significantly shorter in the RVOT group (18.5 ms, interquartile range 25th to 75th percentile [IQR25−75]: 0 to 29.5 ms) compared with the LVOT group (67.5 ms, IQR25−75: 56.5 to 77 ms; p < 0.05). Using a RWDI ≤40 ms to predict an RVOT focus, the sensitivity and specificity of the modified lead RWDI were 100% and 95%, respectively; the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve was 0.96. This was superior to all previously developed algorithms. In a computed tomography analysis (n = 50), the modified leads were significantly closer to the outflow tracts compared with the standard precordial leads. Conclusions: The modified lead RWDI is a simple, easily interpretable algorithm that can potentially differentiate a right- or left-sided origin of OTVA with high accuracy.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85092653313
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85092653313#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1016/j.jacep.2020.07.011
DO - 10.1016/j.jacep.2020.07.011
M3 - Article
C2 - 33121670
AN - SCOPUS:85092653313
SN - 2405-500X
VL - 6
SP - 1405
EP - 1419
JO - JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
JF - JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
IS - 11
ER -