TY - GEN
T1 - Path Planning Algorithms for Autonomous Robot Navigation
AU - Sharma, Kartik
AU - Singla, Vasu
AU - Roy, Nilamber Das
AU - Chadaga, Krishnaraj
AU - James, Jimcymol
AU - Mahadeva, Rajesh
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 IEEE.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Autonomous robots require robust path planning algorithms to navigate complex environments efficiently. This study compares A*, Breadth-First Search (BFS), and Depth-First Search (DFS) for optimal path planning in diverse scenarios. Using a 10 × 10 grid with static and dynamic obstacles, we assess these algorithms based on computation time, path length, memory usage, success rate, and adaptability to dynamic conditions. A∗ employs heuristic optimization for balanced performance, BFS guarantees shortest paths in uniform grids, and DFS prioritizes deep exploration for specific use cases. Results show A∗ achieves 78.5% path optimality with a 94.2% success rate, BFS ensures 100 % optimality but with higher memory demands, and DFS offers rapid execution (28.4 ms) but only 65.4 % optimality. These findings provide practical insights for algorithm selection in real-time robotic applications, with A∗ being optimal for dynamic environments, while BFS and DFS excel in specific structured settings.
AB - Autonomous robots require robust path planning algorithms to navigate complex environments efficiently. This study compares A*, Breadth-First Search (BFS), and Depth-First Search (DFS) for optimal path planning in diverse scenarios. Using a 10 × 10 grid with static and dynamic obstacles, we assess these algorithms based on computation time, path length, memory usage, success rate, and adaptability to dynamic conditions. A∗ employs heuristic optimization for balanced performance, BFS guarantees shortest paths in uniform grids, and DFS prioritizes deep exploration for specific use cases. Results show A∗ achieves 78.5% path optimality with a 94.2% success rate, BFS ensures 100 % optimality but with higher memory demands, and DFS offers rapid execution (28.4 ms) but only 65.4 % optimality. These findings provide practical insights for algorithm selection in real-time robotic applications, with A∗ being optimal for dynamic environments, while BFS and DFS excel in specific structured settings.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105030920635
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105030920635#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1109/AISTS66100.2025.11233179
DO - 10.1109/AISTS66100.2025.11233179
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:105030920635
T3 - 2025 Artificial Intelligence and Smart Technologies for Sustainability Conference, AISTS 2025
BT - 2025 Artificial Intelligence and Smart Technologies for Sustainability Conference, AISTS 2025
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
T2 - 2025 Artificial Intelligence and Smart Technologies for Sustainability Conference, AISTS 2025
Y2 - 21 August 2025 through 23 August 2025
ER -