TY - GEN
T1 - Performance of ad hoc network routing protocols in IEEE 802.11
AU - Putta, Chandra Shekar Reddy
AU - Prasad, K. Bhanu
AU - Ravilla, Dilli
AU - Murali Nath, R. S.
AU - Chandra, M. L Ravi
PY - 2010
Y1 - 2010
N2 - Wireless technology based on the IEEE 802.11 standard is used to support multiple types of communication services (data, voice, and image) with different QoS requirements. Node mobility creates a continuously changing communication topology in which paths break and new one form dynamically. The routing table of each router in an adhoc network must be kept up-to-date. MANET uses Distance Vector or Link State algorithms which insure that the route to every host is always known. However, this approach must take into account the adhoc networks specific characteristics: dynamic topologies, limited bandwidth, energy constraints, and limited physical security. Two main routing protocols categories are studied in this paper: proactive protocols (e.g. Optimized Link State Routing - OLSR) and reactive protocols (e.g. Ad hoc On Demand Distance Vector - AODV, Dynamic Source Routing - DSR). The present paper focuses on study and performance evaluation of these categories using NS2 simulations. We have considered qualitative and quantitative criteria. The first one concerns distributed operation, loop-freedom, security, sleep period operation. The second are used to assess performance of different routing protocols presented in this paper. We can list end-to-end data delay, packet delivery ratio, routing load. Comparative study will be presented with number of networking context consideration and the results show the appropriate routing protocol for two kinds of communication services (data and voice).
AB - Wireless technology based on the IEEE 802.11 standard is used to support multiple types of communication services (data, voice, and image) with different QoS requirements. Node mobility creates a continuously changing communication topology in which paths break and new one form dynamically. The routing table of each router in an adhoc network must be kept up-to-date. MANET uses Distance Vector or Link State algorithms which insure that the route to every host is always known. However, this approach must take into account the adhoc networks specific characteristics: dynamic topologies, limited bandwidth, energy constraints, and limited physical security. Two main routing protocols categories are studied in this paper: proactive protocols (e.g. Optimized Link State Routing - OLSR) and reactive protocols (e.g. Ad hoc On Demand Distance Vector - AODV, Dynamic Source Routing - DSR). The present paper focuses on study and performance evaluation of these categories using NS2 simulations. We have considered qualitative and quantitative criteria. The first one concerns distributed operation, loop-freedom, security, sleep period operation. The second are used to assess performance of different routing protocols presented in this paper. We can list end-to-end data delay, packet delivery ratio, routing load. Comparative study will be presented with number of networking context consideration and the results show the appropriate routing protocol for two kinds of communication services (data and voice).
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/78650560037
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78650560037&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/ICCCT.2010.5640497
DO - 10.1109/ICCCT.2010.5640497
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:78650560037
SN - 9781424490349
T3 - 2010 International Conference on Computer and Communication Technology, ICCCT-2010
SP - 371
EP - 376
BT - 2010 International Conference on Computer and Communication Technology, ICCCT-2010
T2 - 2010 International Conference on Computer and Communication Technology, ICCCT-2010
Y2 - 17 September 2010 through 19 September 2010
ER -