TY - JOUR
T1 - Prognostic significance of CD30 expression in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma
T2 - A systematic review with meta-analysis
AU - Rodrigues-Fernandes, Carla Isabelly
AU - Abreu, Lucas Guimarães
AU - Radhakrishnan, Raghu
AU - Perez, Danyel Elias da Cruz
AU - Amaral-Silva, Gleyson Kleber
AU - Gondak, Rogério de Oliveira
AU - Rahimi, Siavash
AU - Brennan, Peter A.
AU - Fonseca, Felipe Paiva
AU - Vargas, Pablo Agustin
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was supported by The Coordena??o de Aperfei?oamento de Pessoal de N?vel Superior (CAPES/Brazil, Finance Code 001), The Funda??o de Amparo ? Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG/Brazil), The S?o Paulo State Research Foundation (FAPESP/Brazil) and The Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cient?fico e Tecnol?gico (CNPq/Brazil) (#305493/2018-3; #455644/2018-1; #404710/2018-2; #310797/2019-5). P.A.V., D.E.C.P. and F.P.F. are research fellows of CNPq.
Funding Information:
This study was supported by The Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES/Brazil, Finance Code 001), The Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG/Brazil), The São Paulo State Research Foundation (FAPESP/Brazil) and The Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq/Brazil) (#305493/2018‐3; #455644/2018‐1; #404710/2018‐2; #310797/2019‐5). P.A.V., D.E.C.P. and F.P.F. are research fellows of CNPq.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
PY - 2021/7
Y1 - 2021/7
N2 - Background: CD30 is variably expressed in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), but its prognostic potential for the affected patients remains debatable and unclear. Therefore, we aimed to determine the frequency of CD30 expression in DLBCL and its potential for prognostic determination. Methods: An electronic systematic review was performed using multiple databases, followed by a quantitative meta-analysis to assess the frequency of CD30 expression with positivity cut-off values of >0% and >20%, and to determine its association with clinicopathological features and patients’ survival. Results: Using a cut-off value >0%, we observed that 3.5%–59.1% of the cases were considered positive for CD30. There was a significant association of the protein expression with a lower number of extra-nodal sites affected by the neoplasm, with Ann Arbor advanced stage, the absence of B-symptoms, the lack of MYC and BCL2 translocations, and a lower ECOG performance. Using a cut-off value >20%, we observed that 2.5%–36.7% of the cases were considered positive for CD30, being significantly associated with a lower number of extra-nodal sites affected by the neoplasm, Ann Arbor stages III/IV, non-GCB tumours, the lack of MYC and BCL2 translocations, and a lower ECOG value. CD30 expression was significantly associated with a better survival rate, regardless of what cut-off parameter was used. Conclusion: Despite variations in the cut-off values used to determine CD30 positivity in DLBCL, the expression of this protein seems to be associated with a higher survival rate and better prognosis.
AB - Background: CD30 is variably expressed in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), but its prognostic potential for the affected patients remains debatable and unclear. Therefore, we aimed to determine the frequency of CD30 expression in DLBCL and its potential for prognostic determination. Methods: An electronic systematic review was performed using multiple databases, followed by a quantitative meta-analysis to assess the frequency of CD30 expression with positivity cut-off values of >0% and >20%, and to determine its association with clinicopathological features and patients’ survival. Results: Using a cut-off value >0%, we observed that 3.5%–59.1% of the cases were considered positive for CD30. There was a significant association of the protein expression with a lower number of extra-nodal sites affected by the neoplasm, with Ann Arbor advanced stage, the absence of B-symptoms, the lack of MYC and BCL2 translocations, and a lower ECOG performance. Using a cut-off value >20%, we observed that 2.5%–36.7% of the cases were considered positive for CD30, being significantly associated with a lower number of extra-nodal sites affected by the neoplasm, Ann Arbor stages III/IV, non-GCB tumours, the lack of MYC and BCL2 translocations, and a lower ECOG value. CD30 expression was significantly associated with a better survival rate, regardless of what cut-off parameter was used. Conclusion: Despite variations in the cut-off values used to determine CD30 positivity in DLBCL, the expression of this protein seems to be associated with a higher survival rate and better prognosis.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85110098914&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85110098914&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/jop.13208
DO - 10.1111/jop.13208
M3 - Article
C2 - 34101913
AN - SCOPUS:85110098914
SN - 0904-2512
VL - 50
SP - 587
EP - 593
JO - Journal of Oral Pathology and Medicine
JF - Journal of Oral Pathology and Medicine
IS - 6
ER -