Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Review of emerging nanomaterials for CO2 capture and capture-to-conversion: Materials, devices, and system-level perspectives

  • Christopher Selvam D
  • , Yuvarajan Devarajan*
  • , Honganur Raju Manjunath
  • , Sandeep GM
  • , Saroj Kumar Acharya
  • , Alok Tiwari
  • , Pratima Srivastava
  • , Kulmani Mehar
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The expeditious implementation of advanced carbon dioxide capture and capture-to-conversion technologies is imperative to facilitate climate change mitigation, foster cleaner industrial production, and establish resilient infrastructure aligned with sustainable development objectives. Traditional amine scrubbing technologies are hindered by elevated regeneration energy requirements, solvent degradation, and corrosion, necessitating the exploration of durable, energy-efficient alternatives. This review meticulously evaluates next-generation nanomaterials, including metal–organic frameworks (MOFs), porous organic polymers/covalent organic frameworks (POPs/COFs), carbonaceous adsorbents, and hybrid nanocomposites, while correlating material performance with device and system applications. A standardized benchmarking framework systematically compares equilibrium and working capacities, CO₂/N₂ selectivity, tolerance to moisture and impurities (SOₓ/NOₓ), cyclic stability, mass-transfer kinetics, implications for pressure drop, and regeneration energy, while also mapping these metrics to temperature-swing adsorption (TSA)/pressure swing adsorption (PSA)/vacuum swing adsorption (VSA) contactors, structured monoliths, mixed-matrix membranes, and intensified capture–conversion reactors. Innovations such as dynamic/switchable sorbents, photothermal and electro-swing regeneration, defect engineering, and tandem catalytic capture platforms are analyzed, with a focus on scalability, design, and realistic operational conditions in flue-gas environments. Integrated techno-economic analysis (TEA) and life cycle assessment (LCA) findings delineate capital expenditure (CAPEX) and operational expenditure (OPEX), as well as embodied carbon hotspots, with abatement costs typically estimated at 40-80 USD per ton of CO₂ under favorable energy and lifespan assumptions. A roadmap for 2030–2035 emphasizes the importance of durability certification, the deployment of modular retrofitting solutions, and validation at the pilot scale.

Original languageEnglish
Article number101127
JournalChemical Engineering Journal Advances
Volume26
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 2026

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 7 - Affordable and Clean Energy
    SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy
  2. SDG 9 - Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
    SDG 9 Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
  3. SDG 12 - Responsible Consumption and Production
    SDG 12 Responsible Consumption and Production
  4. SDG 13 - Climate Action
    SDG 13 Climate Action

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • General Chemistry
  • Environmental Chemistry
  • General Chemical Engineering
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Review of emerging nanomaterials for CO2 capture and capture-to-conversion: Materials, devices, and system-level perspectives'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this