TY - GEN
T1 - Sensor health monitoring using simple data driven approaches
AU - Mathew, Vipin
AU - Sengupta, Somnath
AU - Chatterjee, Mayurika
AU - Kamath, Srikanth
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 IEEE.
Copyright:
Copyright 2017 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2016/3/24
Y1 - 2016/3/24
N2 - Present day high end vehicles contain as many as 100 microprocessors and have more than 100 million lines of code [3]. Electronic Control Units (ECUs) use numerous sensors spread across various sub-systems to perform a variety of functions such as stability control, adaptive cruise control, power train control, autonomous driving, etc. The accuracy of sensors degrades over the vehicle lifetime. The control logic of vehicles uses sensor measurements to detect the vehicle state and give appropriate commands to control the vehicle. Faults in sensors cause wrong feedback to be sent to the control logic and subsequently commands given by the control logic become faulty. Thus the effect of a sensor fault can be observed in subsystems controlled by the control logic. So advanced diagnosis techniques are required to detect the sensor degradation. In this work, a comparison is made between two different automotive sensor health monitoring methods used to diagnose sensor faults. The methods that are compared are: lookup table based method and machine learning (using multiple linear regression) based method. The comparison will enable one to choose the appropriate method by considering the attributes required for a particular application like accuracy, amount of computation required, simplicity, etc. Sensor faults are detected by comparing the current sensor output with a nominal no-fault sensor block output at the particular operating point of the system. The lookup table method was implemented in Matlab while the machine learning method was implemented using R programming language. The proposed methods are illustrated on the case example of motor fault in a Hybrid Electric Vehicle to analyze their efficacy. They have been found to be valid for all drive cycles and can be used for diagnosing sensor faults in real time.
AB - Present day high end vehicles contain as many as 100 microprocessors and have more than 100 million lines of code [3]. Electronic Control Units (ECUs) use numerous sensors spread across various sub-systems to perform a variety of functions such as stability control, adaptive cruise control, power train control, autonomous driving, etc. The accuracy of sensors degrades over the vehicle lifetime. The control logic of vehicles uses sensor measurements to detect the vehicle state and give appropriate commands to control the vehicle. Faults in sensors cause wrong feedback to be sent to the control logic and subsequently commands given by the control logic become faulty. Thus the effect of a sensor fault can be observed in subsystems controlled by the control logic. So advanced diagnosis techniques are required to detect the sensor degradation. In this work, a comparison is made between two different automotive sensor health monitoring methods used to diagnose sensor faults. The methods that are compared are: lookup table based method and machine learning (using multiple linear regression) based method. The comparison will enable one to choose the appropriate method by considering the attributes required for a particular application like accuracy, amount of computation required, simplicity, etc. Sensor faults are detected by comparing the current sensor output with a nominal no-fault sensor block output at the particular operating point of the system. The lookup table method was implemented in Matlab while the machine learning method was implemented using R programming language. The proposed methods are illustrated on the case example of motor fault in a Hybrid Electric Vehicle to analyze their efficacy. They have been found to be valid for all drive cycles and can be used for diagnosing sensor faults in real time.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84965114705&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84965114705&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/INDIANCC.2016.7441102
DO - 10.1109/INDIANCC.2016.7441102
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:84965114705
T3 - 2016 Indian Control Conference, ICC 2016 - Proceedings
SP - 32
EP - 38
BT - 2016 Indian Control Conference, ICC 2016 - Proceedings
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
T2 - 2nd Indian Control Conference, ICC 2016
Y2 - 4 January 2016 through 6 January 2016
ER -